The preceding sentence takes care of the "justify/indicate" function, and was inserted to replace the deleted sentence.  No sections are being deleted.

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

While I have no major issue either way, one rationale for including that section could be to justify/indicate to the community reason why looking into other option started latter in the process; somewhat historical background to how we got to current status quo.
I don't think leaving that line imply that contract co is off the table. Anyway looks like the document is finalized but will be good to take note during actual discussion at the meeting.

Regards
sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.

On 3 Feb 2015 19:44, "Matthew Shears" <mshears@cdt.org> wrote:
I have to disagree.  The second sentence is unnecessary - other options are being developed (and Contract Co option is still on the table).  In addition to which other options were already being mentioned in the Frankfurt meeting.  It should be deleted.

Matthew


On 2/3/2015 6:15 PM, Christopher Wilkinson wrote:
Good evening:

>  Given the results of the public consultation and the surveys the CWG should develop alternative transition proposals which should include ICANN Internal type solutions.
    There is not enough support for the Contract Co. option at this time to allow the CWG to continue developing only this option. 

With respect to the above paragraph (page 4), I request that the second sentence (currently deleted) should be maintained.

Thankyou

Christopher Wilkinson

On 03 Feb 2015, at 02:12, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com> wrote:

All,

At the request of Lise and Jonathan, given the time-frame is incredibly short, I am including version 3.5 of the discussion document.

Based on 3.2 all changes are in track changes and each change has been attribute via a comment bubble to the person or persons who made the original comment/request.

We have also included the questions which were suggested on today's RFP3 call.

As per Jonathan's request we do need to get this done before heading to Singapore which for most of us will be mid-day Wednesday of this week. As such we would appreciate any significant comments by noon UTC of Wednesday this week at which point we will finalize the document for general distribution.

Thank You.

B.

Ps clean and track changes version included.
<CWG-SingaporeUpdateV3.5clean.docx><CWG-SingaporeUpdateV3.5TrackChanges.docx>_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship



_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship


_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship


_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship