On 20-Apr-15 12:36, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> an ICANN Board rep

Since the other appointees are already ICANN board members, why is an
additional one needed?

while the IETF liaison might already be a ICANN board member, I did not think any of the others were.

As for the GAC and ALAC.  While the work that IANA can be called primarily clerical,  the way it does its work, its budget, the degree to which it responsive, the way it deals with crises &c. are larger issues and in this multistakeholder environment, just seemed appropriate.

avri


    

    

  







	

		
			
				Avast logo
			
		
		
			

				This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
				
www.avast.com