On 21 Apr 2015 23:O04, "Client Committee List for CWG" <cwg-client@icann.org> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Following up on today’s call, below is proposed language for III. A and Annex L.
>
> Annex L:
>
>
>
> Triggers for the Separation Mechanism
>
> An outcome of an IANA Function Review could include a recommendation to initiate a separation of the IANA Functions Operator. This recommendation would be submitted to the ICANN Board for consideration, with ultimate input by the multistakeholder community through the CCWG Accountability mechanisms under consideration.(1)
>> (1) A point for public comment is whether the IANA Function Review recommendation for separation should first be submitted to the Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees for their approval before escalation to the ICANN Board, or whether the IANA Function Review recommendation for separation should be submitted directly to the ICANN Board by the IANA Function Review Team.
|
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
|