It may be just me or it may because I was mostly out of the loop for a week and a half, but in Section III.A.1 of plan the placement of some of the
DT output seems strange to me. For example:
·
It makes perfect sense to me why DT-L (IANA
Function Separation Mechanism) would be in Section III.A.1.1 (Contract extension, cancellation and renewal)
but I don’t understand why DT-M (Escalation Procedures) would be in the same section; Wouldn’t DT-M be better placed in ‘III.A.1.3 Administration/oversight of SOW’
or ‘III.A.1.4 Statement of Work (SOW)’?
·
Also, why would DT-B (Assessment of the Level of Consensus within
the ccTLD Community in Regard to a Possible Appeal Mechanism for ccTLD Delegations and Redelegations) be in ‘Section III.A.1.1 (Contract
extension, cancellation and renewal)’; in my opinion it would also be better placed in ‘III.A.1.3 Administration/oversight
of SOW’ or ‘III.A.1.4 Statement of Work (SOW)’.
Am I missing something here?
Chuck
From:
cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 3:08 PM
To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] For your review - Draft Transition Plan V2.1 and DT Status Overview
Dear All,
As discussed during yesterday’s meeting, please find attached version 2.1 of the draft transition proposal which includes:
Please share any comments / edits you may have with the list.
For your convenience, you will also find the latest version of the design teams status overview which includes some of the improvements discussed during yesterday’s meeting.
Best regards,
Marika