On 28-Nov-14 19:36, Milton L Mueller wrote:
Is the option of having separate complementary contracts by the different users of the IANA functions off the table? MM: By “different users of the IANA functions” do you mean the names, protocols and numbers users? If so I would admonish you again to stick to the knitting of this group, which is focused on names. We are not holistically redesigning the IANA arrangements we are focused on the names part exclusively.
In fact the ICG has done its best to make sure we don't have complementary solutions as the first decision they made on how the process and hence solution should be designed.
It is a coordinators' decision that seems to have been made that most all have just accepted.
avri
_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
Gregory S. Shatan ï Abelman Frayne & Schwab
666 Third Avenue ï New York, NY 10017-5621
Direct 212-885-9253 | Main 212-949-9022
Fax 212-949-9190 | Cell 917-816-6428
ICANN-related: gregshatanipc@gmail.com