Dear Bertrand,

still on the table so in no way a done deal. The ALAC WG on this topic has other (non contractual) alternative proposals which we are trying to refine.
Kind regards,

Olivier

On 27/11/2014 14:05, Bertrand de La Chapelle wrote:
Is the idea of a contract Co. a done deal? Establishing any organization with whatever limited staff is usually a recipe for its growth in time. 

Is the option of having separate complementary contracts by the different users of the IANA functions off the table? 

B.


"Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes", Antoine de Saint Exupéry
("There is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans")

BERTRAND DE LA CHAPELLE
Internet & Jurisdiction Project | Director



On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:
Hi,

I think this has exactly a 180 degree wrong approach
• Contract Co. – This is a not for profit company whose only function is to be signatory to the contract with the IANA Functions Operator. As such this entity would have no staff.

I think that this should have nothing but staff, a minimal staff of one or two  I.e it should have a neutral Administrator that does what the PRT tells her to do in terms of the contract adminstration, and perhaps a backup/aise.  It could also be the Root Zone Management Process Administrator as that is a clerical staff function.

avri


_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship




_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship