Thanks for the share Grace, item no 5 of the agenda gives me serious concern; if we cannot take advantage of our face 2 face and ensure high intensity discussion to produce highly productive outcome. I personally doubt the remote based meeting will achieve more, especially considering most will just be settling down from the face 2 face. Unless we want to produce an outcome that is largely evident of views motivated beyond voluntary. I hope the Co-chairs will take this seriously.

I am raising this just incase I am unable to join in tomorrow's call as I like it to be on record.

Regards

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.

On 16 Mar 2015 17:43, "Grace Abuhamad" <grace.abuhamad@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all, 

Please see below the proposed agenda for the call on 17 March at 17:00 UTC. 

Proposed Agenda 17/3:
1. Opening Remarks
2. Proposal 2.2
3. Design Teams     
     a. Istanbul cut-off on Monday 18:00 UTC     
     b. Update on DT-A (Paul Kane)
     c. Update on DT-B (Allan MacGillivray)
     d. Update on DT-C (Donna Austin)
     e. Status of additional DTs (DT-D; DT-F; DT-L; DT-M; Red team; DT-N)
4. Update from Client Committee
5. AOB
     a. High Intensity 1-2 April 
6. Closing Remarks

Outstanding Actions: 
Action (Robert & Cheryl): suggest text to fill out sections 4 and 5 of proposal (Wiki will serve as basis) 
Action (Avri): Review the work of the CWG and the communications between CCWG/CWG to ensure that the interdependencies are up to date
are they outdated?)


_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship