Hi,

I has sent a copy of DT-X Separation Mechanism to the list.  It certainly needs conversation, but I think that we need to fill this gap in the proposal before it goes out.

Have included it again with this message.

Perhaps the short  form can sit in III.A.xi  - something like

III.A.xi Separation Mechanism

A fundamental bylaw will be created to define a Separation Mechanism that can be triggered by the ICANN community if needed.  This would only occur when other escalation mechanisms and methods have been exhausted.  A cross community of the SOAC would be formed to review the issues and make recommendations. The recommendations would need to be approved by the ICANN Board and would be subject to all escalations and appeals mechanisms.


There would be no prescribed action for the Separation Mechanism.  It would be empowered to make a recommendation ranging from “no action required” to the initiation of an RFP and the recommendation a new IANA Function Operator. 


avri


On 17-Apr-15 17:58, Marika Konings wrote:
Dear All,

Please find attached for your review the latest version of the CWG-Stewardship Transition Proposal. Please note that it is still very much work in progress as some key pieces are still missing such as the information from the legal memo that is forthcoming, outstanding work of the design teams (DT A) as well as final language from ‘DT X’. However, we did already want to give you an opportunity to review where we are at and as such we would like to encourage you to instead of editing the document line by line, to focus on whether there is information missing or incorrect, the updated recommendations of some of the design teams (e.g. DT M and N) as well as reviewing some of the changes we have made for style and consistency purposes to the DT recommendations. Note that thanks to Kim Davies a number of clarifications have been made to section I and II. 

We are still working on the annexes (focused on consistency and readability) as well as formatting and numbering of the overall document. 

As we’ve moved quite some things around in section III to follow a more logical order, there is a lot of redline in the document which does not necessarily represent new or changed content, but also content that has changed position. As such, you will also find attached a clean version to facilitate your review. 

Please share any comments you may have (preferably with a reference to page number and section) with the mailing list by Monday 23.59 UTC at the latest.

Best regards,

Marika


_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship



Avast logo

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com