But what would the thresholds be?  And, currently an SIFR comes as a result of other mechanisms being exhausted as well as the IANA probems resolution process.

The Special IFR would be triggered by a supermajority vote of each of the ccNSO and GNSO Councils according to their normal procedures for determining supermajority.

Would we require a supermajority of only the Board, or in addition to the ccNSO and GNSO.  And as a result of the mechanisms being exhausted?  I would assume so.

Matthew


On 6/5/2015 4:05 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
I can't 
--MM

-----Original Message-----
From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-
bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2015 5:02 PM
To: avri@acm.org; cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Final response from DT-M regarding public
comments

Good catch Avri and good question. Can anyone think of a  reason why the
ICANN Board should not be able to request an SIFR?

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-
bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 4:39 PM
To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Final response from DT-M regarding public
comments

Hi,

I am part of DT-M and partly responsible for this.

But.  It has a cost, which I did mention on the DT-M list:

There is currently no mechanism defined for the Board to initiate a SIFR.

Should there be?

avri


On 04-Jun-15 16:10, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
Here is DT-M's final proposed response to comment review tool item #
246 regarding AFRALO's suggestion that the PTI Board be allowed to
initiate a SIFR directly:  *"DT M carefully considered the
recommendation to allow the PTI Board to initiate a Special IFR but
decided against that while at the same time noting that the PTI Board
could request that the ICANN Board consider doing so."*



If there are any questions, please let me know.



Chuck


          "This message (including any attachments) is intended only
          for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
          addressed, and may contain information that is non-public,
          proprietary, privileged, confidential and exempt from
          disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as
          attorney work product. If you are not the intended
          recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
          dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
          communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
          this message in error, notify sender immediately and delete
          this message immediately."



_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

-- 
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 (0)771 247 2987