Jonathan,
Most of the changes you made seem useful to me but I don’t think it is the responsibility of the IANA CWG or its chartering organizations to approve the CCWG work stream 1 recommendations except to the extent
that they impact our recommendations. Our task will be to determine whether the accountability recommendations from work stream 1 satisfy our needs with respect to CWG recommendations; that may or may not involve all of the work stream 1 recommendations.
Maybe I am nitpicking; if so let me know.
Chuck
From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 4:30 PM
To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Chart on CWG link with CCWG on Accountability (UPDATED)
All,
In reviewing the flow-chart, I felt it could do with some revisions as I have commented on a number of occasions.
Most strikingly, the phrase “conditional accountability” has been causing some issues in that it’s not clear what this means, especially to the CCWG on Accountability, as was evidenced by reference
to it on various occasions during their face-to-face meeting today. What I understand that we mean by “conditional accountability” is that we view our proposal is conditional on specific accountability measures being put in place.
Please see below for a summary of the changes which are encapsulated in the updated flow chart.
The changes in the attached are as follows:
As ever, any comments or incremental improvements / developments welcome.
Jonathan
From: Jonathan Robinson
[mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info]
Sent: 14 January 2015 08:56
To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Cc: Lise Fuhr (lise.fuhr@difo.dk)
Subject: Chart on CWG link with CCWG on Accountability
All,
Please see attached for a draft / proposal for the mechanics and flow of linking the work of this CWG with that of the CCWG on Accountability.
As you know, this is a critical area of our work. Accordingly, this chart is provided to facilitate discussion on the subject and to assist us in getting to a common CWG view of the linkage and relationship.
Thank-you,
Jonathan & Lise
Co-chairs