+1 that was my understanding of why the SSAC69 review was to go into a DT, I think we discussed this on last weeks call.
From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 6:56 PM
To: Seun Ojedeji; Marika Konings
Cc: cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Design team list
I thought that the RFP groups were dissolved and no longer exist. Alan
At 02/03/2015 06:50 AM, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the share, 2 minor comments:
- Why do we need a design team E (SAC 69) isn't that the role of RFP-4? Perhaps i miss-understood the purpose of the DT as i thought their work is largely to build-up RFP-3 response.
- I think DT "D" and "F" are almost related OR at least "D" can be a subsection of "F" especially since D is a matter of answering the Yes or No question and if yes then it goes over to F
Regards
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org > wrote:For your information, all the information related to design teams has been
posted here: https://community.icann.org/x/pAknAw.
Best regards,
Marika
On 01/03/15 21:13, "Lise Fuhr" <lise.fuhr@difo.dk> wrote:
>Dear all,
>Here is as requested the list of design teams. This will also be available
>on the website. We will ensure that the list continuously is updated.
>Best regards,
>Jonathan & Lise
_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------Seun Ojedeji,
Federal University Oye-Ekiti
Mobile: +2348035233535
alt email: seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng
The key to understanding is humility - my view !
_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship