Suffice it to say that agree with chuck & milton’s comments on keeping the client committee as announced by Jonathan.



--
Robert Guerra
Phone: +1 416-893-0377 
Twitter: twitter.com/netfreedom 
Email: rguerra@privaterra.org

On Jan 24, 2015, at 10:19 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> wrote:

Agree with Chuck. Also the client committee as announced was balanced and impartial. I would oppose efforts to add people in order to make it less balanced.
 
--MM
From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 3:25 PM
To: Donna Austin; Cheryl Langdon-Orr
Cc: cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Legal Advice - Client Committee
 
Keep in mind that the client committee is for selecting and interacting with the legal expert(s), not for preparing the questions.  All of us will have input regarding the questions.  If we add the author of each major proposal, the client team will become too large in my opinion.  The larger the client team is the more expensive the consultation will be.
 
_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship