Well even if it's yes (which is also my personal opinion), I don't think ICANN as a stakeholder just like every other stakeholder within CWG should be given posting rights on the client list.
I will assume ICANN board chair for instance recognises this hence his reason for subscribing as an observer.

On a lighter note, all these are minor issues to me and I will say could be a little distracting. Getting response from the legal firm is the most important now!

On 13 Mar 2015 20:44, "Avri Doria" <avri@acm.org> wrote:

On 13-Mar-15 15:34, David Conrad wrote:

Is ICANN staff a stakeholder in the transition or not?

that seems to be a point of dispute.

Some like me believe/argue yes.
Many others believe/argue no.

Definitely not something we have consensus on.

avri

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com

_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship