Hi,

No, sorry. It was something we heard. No details given other than that we had to come to the meeting to hear more.  So it was perhaps a trailer to make sure we came to the meeting.  As if anyone could keep us away.

Also, it was an ALAC IANA transition WG meeting I was sitting in, not an ALAC new gTLD meeting, but I was reading an email from the new gTLD list at the time, so I had a context leak.  One of the problems of multitasking: memory leaks.

avri

PS. A few of us in NCSG ( Brenden Kuerbis, Matt Shears and me) have been working on an Integrated Model proposal the last few days in which we try to satisfy some of the important considerations of both the External and Internal models while maintaining simplicity, security, stability and resiliency. This is still a work in progress. But I heard there were 'rumors' about it, so figured I should reveal.



On 10-Feb-15 18:27, James Gannon wrote:

Can you give any more details Avri?

 

Process changes or something more substantial?

 

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 10:22 AM
To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] checking on rumors of big changes in the way we work

 

Hi,

Sitting in an ALAC New GTLD WG meeting and just heard about big changes coming  in the way the CWG was going to work.  My curiosity is piqued.

Any updates for the CWG itself?

Or did I misunderstand what I was hearing.

avri