I don’t understand Kavouss.  Are you suggesting that the Names Community should not fill all three seats on the CCG?

 

Also, what did I say that conveys my support of anything in my message below?  I simply reported what happened in the meeting and associated it to Seun’s suggestion.

 

Chuck

 

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Kavouss Arasteh
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2016 3:45 PM
To: Jonathan Robinson; cwg-stewardship@icann.org

Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CCG Reps for names community

 

Jonathan,

I do not understand the argument of Seun that all of the sudden he becomes smeared supporter of Intellectual property.

I do not understand that nor the support of Chuck.

I do not think that we need additional person at all

Kavouss

 

 

2016-09-10 16:51 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info>:

Seun,

 

Please note that the drafting of the letter of appointment (as per the action you refer to) does not in any way pre-suppose the names of the actual appointees.

 

As the call records will show, I put a strawman out for the IANA IPR Group as the initial appointees for the CCG reps; 2 x Co-chairs (of CWG) plus Greg Shatan (as CCG Co-Chair).

 

Any other suggestions / proposals are clearly very welcome.

 

Jonathan

 

From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@verisign.com]
Sent: 10 September 2016 13:51
To: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>; Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer@icann.org>
Cc: cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CCG Reps for names community

 

Seun,

 

Note that it was suggested that Greg Shatan serve as one of the interim CCG members; if we do that, it clearly would satisfy your recommendation that “a third interim member is selected from the intellectual property constituency”.

 

Chuck

 

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Seun Ojedeji
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2016 4:46 AM
To: Brenda Brewer
Cc: cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] CCG Reps for names community

 

Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On 10 Sep 2016 9:05 a.m., "Brenda Brewer" <brenda.brewer@icann.org> wrote:
> Discussed selection of CCG representatives.
> Suggestion that CWG co-chairs act as interim CCG reps until a process is figured out by the chartering organizations.
>

SO: Like I raised on the call, I think we may be putting too much responsibilities on the Co-Chairs who are volunteers. I expect quite a lot of developmental/setup activity will commence once these various groups are formed, which may imply significant amount of time commitment. I will like to suggest we select other members within the CWG to serve as interim instead. However, whoever we select should include someone from the intellectual property constituency as I think this would be their area of strength. The interims should agree to report to the CWG/COs and make decisions based on their approval.

> ACTION (Client committee): instruct Sidley to draft a letter of appointment of CCG reps.
>

SO: I left the room during this discussion, does the action above imply that it has been concluded that we use the Co-Chairs? If that is the case, I suggest a third interim member is selected from the intellectual property constituency.

On a much lighter note, i hope it has been clarified that there is no possible conflict in having PTI board members serve as CCG members.

Regards

> 5. AOB
>
> IRP will be functional by the time of the transition
>
> ACTION (CGWG): monitor development of IRP
>
> Next meeting 15 Sep @06:00UTC
>
>  
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>

_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship