prematurely sent.  needed to remove the dangling Finally and sign it.

avri


On 20-Feb-15 18:18, Avri Doria wrote:

On 20-Feb-15 16:50, Milton L Mueller wrote:

My question:

 

Does this model provide for separability?

 


First it provides structural separation in all configurations.  That is a first level of severability and hopefully as much as really is ever needed.  Additionally, in this model, ICANN would have the same ability to pick another provider, or perhaps a redundant provider, just as the names or protocols can now.  This is made possible by virtue of structural  separation and the defintion of SLA/MOUs across a corporate boundary.

Further levels of separability can, however, be obtained in the Shared Service Arrangement configuration or the finally in the Free Standing configuration.

Finally




_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship