Dear all,
The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA Call #25 03 March are available here: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52890431
· Action: Chairs will get back to group with DT list and priorities
· Action: Would like an additional GAC person for IAP Team
· Action: Scope document produced before next meeting
· Action: Call for volunteers to join DTs
· Action: Paul and Elise solve the last issue with Martin
· Action: Stephanie to put forth wording proposal for multistakeholder text
1. Opening Remarks
· No outstanding action items
· No longer RFP subgroups
· DT groups will work
· Working on getting legal advice
2. Final Review of Design Team Method
· List of DTs: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/Design+Teams+List
· Are there "rules" for volunteering? If there are too many people who want to join a DT, Chairs will do selection (expertise and time commitment based)
3. Review scope of DTA and DTB and launch
· Service Levels Expectations (lead: Paul Kane)
· IAP (lead: Allan MacGillivray)
· CSC (lead: Donna Austin)
· Each team will have its own mailing list which will be publically archived
SLE Team
· Paul Kane: SLE group will review the status quo
· 3 gTLD reps: Jeff Eckhaus; Jeff Neuman; and Elaine Prius.
· 3 ccTLD reps: Jay Daley, (AP Region), Patricio Poblete (LAC Region) and Paul Kane (Europe)
· IANA staff and SSAC can provide liaisons but that may need to be handled privately
· First slide is data taken from IANA site
· IANA service is efficient when it comes to sending NTIA requests (when NTIA is removed, the delay is removed)
· Deliverable (part 1): Identify IANA workflow process and document it
· At the moment the group is not looking at how SLAs will be amended in the future.
IAP Team
· Allan MacGillivray sends his apologies (Lise will present for him)
· Team includes: Maarten Simon and Elise Lindeberg
· Action: Would like an additional GAC person
CSC Team
· Donna Austin will lead
· Staffan Jonson has volunteered
· Action: Scope document produced before next meeting
4. Review Structure of CWG Proposal v2.0
· sent out prior to meeting last Thursday, but many commented that they required more time to review
· now that time has passed, are there any questions?
· Still possible to send in proposals for DTs (and scoping document please)
5. Update on Client Committee work
Update from Greg Shatan
· Over the course of past several days, the Committee met with the 3 shortlisted firms
· In each case, the corporate governance expert was the main focus/team lead
· Had debrief call on Monday afternoon (John Jeffrey; Sam Eisner; Kevin Espinola from ICANN were there but reclused themselves from decisions)
· Front runner has emerged, and focus is now on 'nuts&bolts' of engagement: 1) matching the need for public and transparent process; and 2) structure of fee relationship, engagement letter, etc.
· Greg is checking with firms before releasing names of firms
· All firms understand political situation in DC
· No firm budget but the idea is to manage this in a cost-effective way
· End of this week or early next week for engagement
6. Discuss Principles – Path Forward
Presented by Martin.
· Review of gii - currently two options. CWG to identify whether there is a strong preference for or objection to either option.
· Action: Paul and Elise solve the last issue with Martin
· Review of evi -
· For the remaining items, probably easiest to start at top of document go through open comments from group
· Action: Stephanie to put forth wording proposal for multistakeholder text
7. AOB & Review of Action Items
· Action: Chairs will get back to group with DT list and priorities
· Action: Would like an additional GAC person for IAP Team
· Action: Scope document produced before next meeting
· Action: Call for volunteers to join DTs
· Action: Paul and Elise solve the last issue with Martin
· Action: Stephanie to put forth wording proposal for multistakeholder text
8. Closing Remarks
Next call is Thursday at 11:00 UTC.
