They should not have changed. You should read it as "Strongly Agree." We should change this in the survey.

On Thursday, January 8, 2015, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@verisign.com> wrote:

I didn’t even notice the change but my understanding was that the choices would stay the same as in the first survey.

 

Chuck

 

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 2:30 PM
To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Survey Links - for your convenience

 

Hi,

Thanks to both you and Robert.

Started doing S2.

Did we have a reason for switching from Strongly Agree to Completely Agree.
And why did we do that?
And do we really mean completely?!

I know as a member I am not answering for myself but for a group, but i can't imagine many things in this world that either I or the NCSG agrees with completely. 
When you add ambiguity to the questions and the answers, it becomes even more unlikely.

avri

On 08-Jan-15 12:44, Greg Shatan wrote:

Here is an MS Word copy.  Checking if there is a PDF copy to be had.

 

Greg

 

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:

Hi,

And is there a pdf copy of survey 2 for consultation no matter how brief they might be?

thanks
& apologies if i missed it

avri

On 08-Jan-15 07:37, Greg Shatan wrote:

 

Just in case you might have difficulty locating the two links, so that you can use this "free hour" :-) productively, I supply them here:

Survey #2: http://goo.gl/forms/N8smhdeUk8

Greg



_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

 


_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship