In Frankfurt we used the term "entity" as if it was something
other than some for of company or corporation. We have now replaced it
with "corporation". Others assure me that a corporation is
possible with no Board or members or owners or shareholders or officers
or bank account, but I have yet to fully understand how this works.
I will be addressing some of this in my comments, hopefully later
tonight.
Alan
At 28/11/2014 06:32 PM, Greg Shatan wrote:
Olivier,
I'm not sure exactly what you mean by the "configuration" of
Contract Co. We certainly have discussed the "form" the
entity would take, i.e., a nonprofit corporation. Place of
incorporation has not been significantly discussed in recent days, though
we had a number of email exchanges and some discussion of jurisdiction
earlier in a variety of contexts.
Greg
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
<ocl@gih.com> wrote:
- On 28/11/2014 16:36, Milton L Mueller wrote:
-
-
- From:
cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org
[
mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Bertrand
de La Chapelle
- Is the idea of a contract Co. a done deal? Establishing any
organization with whatever limited staff is usually a recipe for its
growth in time.
-
- MM: The idea that there should be a contracting entity separate from
ICANN is, I believe, a done deal. It reflects some of the principles we
agreed on (such as separability) and the general agreement that, as the
draft proposal says,
- “The current arrangements provided by the NTIA for the oversight
and accountability of the IANA Functions are generally satisfactory and
the objective of the CWG is to replicate these as faithfully as
possible”
- This is not at all how I understood it. The discussion on whether the
"contracting entity" should be a contract co. or something else
has never been touched - certainly no alternatives have been seriously
considered.
-
- MM: On the other hand, whether the specific configuration of the
Contract Co. is optimal for achieving those purposes could still be open.
I would say is still open to _modification_; any modification that
accomplishes the agreed objectives but avoids any problems that might
arise would be welcomed by the CWG I imagine.
- The configuration of the Contract Co. has not been discussed either.
We know what functions should be undertaken and what broad
characteristics would be needed. No discussion of jurisdiction nor
configuration of the entity has been done except on RFP4 call today where
we started to touch on it.
- Kind regards,
- Olivier
- _______________________________________________
- CWG-Stewardship mailing list
-
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
-
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
--
Gregory S. Shatan ï Abelman Frayne & Schwab
666 Third Avenue ï New York, NY 10017-5621
Direct 212-885-9253 | Main
212-949-9022
Fax 212-949-9190 | Cell
917-816-6428
gsshatan@lawabel.com
ICANN-related:
gregshatanipc@gmail.com
www.lawabel.com
_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship