I also don't think it's accurate to state that failing to embrace the CRISP proposal will result in "any of our three community proposals having to go back to the community process and seek for re-approval."  There's no indication that needs to happen, and stating that it will tends to look like an attempt to shove the CWG into accepting the CRISP proposal by proposing that some awful thing will happen if we don't. That may not have been the intent, but it certainly could be the effect.