Thanks for sharing this Jonathan. I note from CRISP response that going the IETF trust route would require less/no further consultation with her community. I think we (CWG) could agree to this route as well, while indicating the expected "high level" principles for the holder of the IPR.

The principles can then be developed further at the implementation phase.

Regards

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:


-----Original Message-----
From: Izumi Okutani [mailto:izumi@nic.ad.jp]
Sent: 17 August 2015 17:08
Subject: The CRISP Team observation on IPR

Dear Jonathan and Lise,


I'd appreciate it if you would help us share this with the CWG.
As others have expressed in a seperate thread, it's great to see the CWG
discussions are now moving towards consensus.

Talk to you in a few hours.


Thanks,
Izumi & Nurani


---
Dear CWG members,


Attached is the CRISP Team observation on IPR.
It is not fully brushed up nor articulate in terms of wording, as the CRISP
Team wanted to deliver this to the CWG as early as possible, but all the
points to be shared with the CWG are covered.

We hope this serves as a reference in your discussions, and we would be
happy to provide any additional information, clarifications needed for
discussions in the CWG.


Best Regards,
Izumi Okutani, Nurani Nimpuno
Chair, Vice-Chair, The CRISP Team





_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship




--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seun Ojedeji,
Federal University Oye-Ekiti
web:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
Mobile: +2348035233535
alt email: seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng

The key to understanding is humility - my view !