This is looking very good to me. I have just one question: Wouldn’t it be a good idea to refer to the two annexes in the primary body of the document?

Chuck

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Turcotte
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2015 12:41 PM
To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG - Draft Report for Singapore

All, please find attached the draft report for the Singapore meeting and the updated timeline.

Questions and comments welcome.

Jonathan and Lise would also like input on questions which could be added to this document which would provide useful feedback for our work.

Cheers.