Hi all, 

We looked into this and noted that the Continuity & Contingency Plan is confidential and cannot be distributed. 

Notes, transcripts, and recordings for RFP4 call are available here: https://community.icann.org/x/MYcQAw 

Best, 

Grace

From: Guru Acharya <gurcharya@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 8:05 AM
To: Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>
Cc: "cwg-stewardship@icann.org" <cwg-stewardship@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Composition of MRT

Hi Avri,

This was an action item for the staff from the call on 25th November. I believe they have already put in a request for the document with the IANA staff. Maybe Grace or Marika can update us on the request.

"ACTION staff : Ask IANA staff to share details on 7.3 that might be available for the public and/or online"

On 17 Dec 2014 17:29, "Avri Doria" <avri@acm.org> wrote:

Hi,

Is that 'transition to a "successor  contractor" plan' available to the CWG?

avri

On 17-Dec-14 05:26, Matthew Shears wrote:

Alan

Section C.7 in the current contract addresses issues of continuity of operations - particularly C.7.3, according to which ICANN should have a transition to a "successor
contractor" plan in place at the moment

Matthew

On 12/17/2014 3:38 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:

As someone whose ICANN 'job" is supporting/defending the needs of Internet users, I will point out that security and stability of the IANA functions is of paramount importance for the ALAC as well.

I look forward to the seeing how that can be assured in a potentially disruptive switch of the IANA operator where it may be that there is no continuity of either staff or systems.

Alan

At 15/12/2014 03:16 PM, Donna Austin wrote:

All

I largely agree with Christopher. I think we are creating complexity where it does not necessarily need to be, but as we are here I want to reiterate a few comments I made on the RFP 3 call earlier today, and these comments come from a gTLD registry operator perspective:

·         Operational stability and reliability of the IANA service is imperative to the business operations of registry operators and as such this should be a critical consideration in any discussions.

_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship