Hi,

I believe we will need some bylaws changes,

- we discussed that the IANA Review Team would be one of the AOC-like review that CCWG is currently proposing be put in the bylaws. CCWG has a place holder for that one in their work.

- the first golden bylaw, now fundamental bylaw, I ever heard discussed was the original Nuclear-RFP bylaw. the Separation mechansim is an escalation mechanism version of that original nuclear option, and I believe one that would need to be defined by a bylaw.

- all of the ongoing groups, e.g. SOAC, with a degree of powers are all defined in the bylaws. It seemed to me that for the CSC to be real, it would need to be defined in a bylaw. I admit, no else has indicated that, just seems that way to me.

I can't think of any others, yet until today, it had not occurred to me that we might need one for the CSC. So I figure there might be others and it is the sort of thing we should understand.

avri

On 17-Apr-15 09:17, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

Do we need them for the IANA Review Team (formally the Periodic Review Team)?

Chuck

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 7:56 AM
To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Bylaws requirements for CWG

Hi,

Was thinking about bylaws for DT-N Review and DT-X Separation mechanism and realized that we might also need one to establish the CSC.

What other bylaws might the CWG need. We should probably make a list.

avri

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com