Hi,

Apologies, guess I picked the wrong email. I hope I can be forgiven for this sin.

I guess that means that my viewpoints will just be ignored.

But if this group is able to decide that multistakeholder models are not applicable, no matter which thread an email is attached to. I think we may be in more trouble than I think we are. Are you saying we have consensus on a principle against commitment to the multistakeholder model? How can that be when the multistakeholder model is really one of the first principles we much meet for an NTIA solution

avri

On 14-Nov-14 22:48, Guru Acharya wrote:

Avri - You got the wrong thread. This thread is for RFP2B and not the
principles.

And your suggested principle for a multi-stakeholder composition of the
oversight council appears to be in contradiction to Strawman 1 and ignores
the range of discussions that happened on this list about the composition.

On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:

 Hi,

I have suggested a few edits to the doc.  hope I did it in the mandated
manner.

the changes refer to

- transparency and requirements that any and all audit reports be
published.
- bottom-up modalities
- multistakeholder nature of any committee or oversight arrangements.

Hope I did not mess up any of the formatting.

avri


_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship