On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> wrote:
Again, I object strongly to this decision. It is not a productive way.

Negative!!! rfp3 is for discussing response to section 3 of the ICG request simple! I don't see where its indicated that this list is for contract co discussion. I don't think its right to associate being productive to this particular issue because what is to be discussed is within scope! Again it would not have mattered much to me if a new list was created but trying to imply some form of seclusion or interference is what i am strongly opposed to!

Regards

> -----Original Message-----

> Jaap - I believe that we have decided that RFP3b will have the same email list
> as RFP3, that is, the full CWG list.
>
_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship



--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seun Ojedeji,
Federal University Oye-Ekiti
web:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
Mobile: +2348035233535
alt email: seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng

The key to understanding is humility - my view !