Grec
This is my suggestion
Kavouss
CWG-Stewardship is considering the appropriate entity to be the signatory to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community. ICANN has been included in this draft.  ICANN (or another counterparty) would be subject to process and criteria as determined by CWG-Stewardship.

2016-08-11 18:16 GMT+02:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>:
All, 

As discussed, the following is the proposed footnote to accompany the inclusion of ICANN (in square brackets to indicate the non-final nature of that proposal) as the potential signatory to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community.

This will need to be finalized in the next 1-2 hours so that the documents can be put out for public comment today.  No objections were heard on today's call.  Any violent objections or genius revisions should be sent in reply to this email.

CWG-Stewardship is considering the appropriate entity to be the signatory to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community.  At the request of the CWG-Stewardship, ICANN has indicated that it could serve as the counterparty to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community and ICANN has been included in this draft.  ICANN (or another counterparty) would be subject to process and criteria as determined by CWG-Stewardship.

Greg

_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship