Hi,

By and large I think this is a good description. And a group I would be interested in participating in.

One issue I think needs to be added to the detailed description is:

What role, if any, do the other SOAC have in escalating IANA rname services issues?

Thanks

avri


On 11-Mar-15 15:17, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

Thanks Marika.

 

To hopefully facilitate increased progress on the DTs, I took a first crack at completing the template for Design Team M.  I strongly welcome edits, additions, deletions, etc.

 

Chuck

 

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 3:08 PM
To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] For your review - Draft Transition Plan V2.1 and DT Status Overview

 

Dear All,

 

As discussed during yesterday’s meeting, please find attached version 2.1 of the draft transition proposal which includes:

  • References in section 3 to Design Teams
  • New section covering .INT
  • Placeholders in section 3 where staff is developing text for CWG review
  • Some minor other edits

 

Please share any comments / edits you may have with the list. 

 

For your convenience, you will also find the latest version of the design teams status overview which includes some of the improvements discussed during yesterday’s meeting.

 

Best regards,

 

Marika



_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship



This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com