hi,

I think you are pretty much right about it being unsolved.
Every time we get close to those issue we shy away from them.

We have talked a little about using a certified auditor firm to duplicate the task.
We have talked about not needing anyone to do that task.
And a few opinion points in between.
At one point we had a suggestion that the/a staffer of Contract Co could do it it, but it was at that point that we realized that Contract  Co was growing in functionality

Perhaps it deserves a design team of its own.

avri

On 22-Feb-15 15:05, David Conrad wrote:
Milton,


I'm curious: where are the IANA operational issues associated with the
transition supposed to be discussed in your view?

Here and in the ICG. Not sure I understand why that isn't evident to you.

Because, to date and to my knowledge, no one has actually discussed IANA
operational issues -- from my undoubtedly naïve perspective, the CWG
appears to have been solely focused on duplicating the effort of the CCWG.
Admittedly, I haven't been following too closely, but last I looked, even
the most obvious and critical aspect, namely the fact that NTIA is in the
direct operational loop for ALL root zone changes was termed an "orphan
issue"(!).

Can you point me to where the CWG (or the ICG) have been discussing IANA
operational issues?  I'd like to get caught up.

Thanks,
-drc



_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship