The implication of this letter from the ccNSO is that it will only proceed to approval with final proposals available for prior community review.

And so as a result, the combined timetable we have been working to is not achievable: that chartering organisation will only be able to approve at/after an ICANN meeting, not before hand. It would be either Buenos Aires, or Dublin.

Am I reading this right?

best

Jordan

On 26 March 2015 at 17:13, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:

From: Byron Holland [mailto:byron.holland@cira.ca]
Sent: 26 March 2015 17:04
To: rickert@anwaelte.de; leonfelipe@sanchez.mx; lise.fuhr@difo.dk; Mathieu Weill; jrobinson@afilias.info
Cc: ccnso-council@icann.org
Subject: Letter ccNSO Decision-Making Process

Dear Lise, Jonathan, Leon, Mathieu, and Thomas,

Please find attached a letter on behalf of the ccNSO Council.

Kind regards,

Byron

_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

Jordan Carter

Chief Executive
InternetNZ

04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
jordan@internetnz.net.nz
Skype: jordancarter

A better world through a better Internet