DT-N will look at a process to effect such improvement. It will also come from deficiencies identified by the CSC. Alan At 23/03/2015 12:17 AM, Seun Ojedeji wrote:

Thanks for the share, I presume the "continuous improvement" section is what the DT-N of Avri intends to provide input towards.

Cheers! sent from Google nexus 4 kindly excuse brevity and typos. On 22 Mar 2015 21:31, "Paul M Kane - CWG" <<mailto:paul.kane-cwg@icb.co.uk>paul.kane-cwg@icb.co.uk> wrote: Dear all

As promised I would try and get our interim DRAFT report to you this week-end - pleased see attached.

The goal of this paper is to review the current IANA functions and to capture the current Service Levels IANA is delivering to the registry community.

The objective is to recognise the status-quo, document it (in an SLE form) and to identify any gaps/issues going forward.

During Istanbul, I sincerely hope we will come up with a list of questions for IANA to help address the "?" we may have. We will then ask NTIA for a concession to permit IANA to answer those questions, and I will report back to the CWG group with answers.

Hope this is helpful.

Unfortunately my day job is quite hectic Monday through Wednesday - so please hold any questions until our Istanbul meeting when I plan to explain the document in person.

Kind regards to all

best

Paul

_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list <mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org>CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship