FW: [client com] Separation Review and Related Documents from Sidley
Forwarding Sidley¹s work on Separation Process. From: <Flanagan>, Sharon Flanagan <sflanagan@sidley.com> Date: Friday, May 22, 2015 at 5:47 PM To: Client Committee <cwg-client@icann.org> Subject: [client com] Separation Review and Related Documents from Sidley Dear All, Attached please find the following documents: 1. Our comments to the Separation Process document. 2. An updated document addressing CCWG dependencies to reflect the Separation Process. This document is an extract from the CCWG proposal and is marked to show proposed changes. Consider whether you would want to communicate these new dependencies to CCWG through a comment letter to their proposal. 3. A revised punch list document. Please note that this is not Staff-maintained punch list. Instead it is the Sidley version where we added in the inputs we received from Greg from the design teams. We also attach a redline so Staff can see what changes we are proposing and those changes can be carried over to the master punch list being maintained by Staff. A few notes on the punch list: a. We have identified new items arising out of the design team input (those are in yellow); b. We have added the PTI item we discussed regarding input from ICANN finance/tax on the tax exempt status of PTI (#1A); and c. We suggested specific wording changes to the CWG proposal to address the design team inputs on the punch list. Grace could you please forward to CWG? Best regards, Holly, Sharon and Josh SHARON FLANAGAN Partner Sidley Austin LLP 555 California Street Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94104 +1.415.772.1271 sflanagan@sidley.com <mailto:sflanagan@sidley.com> www.sidley.com <http://www.sidley.com> <http://www.sidley.com/> SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP **************************************************************************** ************************ This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately. **************************************************************************** ************************
Avri, I identified two issues in this process that for which I inserted comments that are highlighted in yellow. Chuck From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Grace Abuhamad Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 12:53 PM To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] Separation Review and Related Documents from Sidley Forwarding Sidley's work on Separation Process. From: <Flanagan>, Sharon Flanagan <sflanagan@sidley.com<mailto:sflanagan@sidley.com>> Date: Friday, May 22, 2015 at 5:47 PM To: Client Committee <cwg-client@icann.org<mailto:cwg-client@icann.org>> Subject: [client com] Separation Review and Related Documents from Sidley Dear All, Attached please find the following documents: 1. Our comments to the Separation Process document. 2. An updated document addressing CCWG dependencies to reflect the Separation Process. This document is an extract from the CCWG proposal and is marked to show proposed changes. Consider whether you would want to communicate these new dependencies to CCWG through a comment letter to their proposal. 3. A revised punch list document. Please note that this is not Staff-maintained punch list. Instead it is the Sidley version where we added in the inputs we received from Greg from the design teams. We also attach a redline so Staff can see what changes we are proposing and those changes can be carried over to the master punch list being maintained by Staff. A few notes on the punch list: a. We have identified new items arising out of the design team input (those are in yellow); b. We have added the PTI item we discussed regarding input from ICANN finance/tax on the tax exempt status of PTI (#1A); and c. We suggested specific wording changes to the CWG proposal to address the design team inputs on the punch list. Grace - could you please forward to CWG? Best regards, Holly, Sharon and Josh SHARON FLANAGAN Partner Sidley Austin LLP 555 California Street Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94104 +1.415.772.1271 sflanagan@sidley.com<mailto:sflanagan@sidley.com> www.sidley.com<http://www.sidley.com> [http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png]<http://www.sidley.com/> SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP **************************************************************************************************** This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately. ****************************************************************************************************
Those edits have my support Chuck On Fri, 29 May 2015 09:47 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@verisign.com> wrote:
Avri,
I identified two issues in this process that for which I inserted comments that are highlighted in yellow.
Chuck
*From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Grace Abuhamad *Sent:* Tuesday, May 26, 2015 12:53 PM *To:* cwg-stewardship@icann.org *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] Separation Review and Related Documents from Sidley
Forwarding Sidley’s work on Separation Process.
*From: *<Flanagan>, Sharon Flanagan <sflanagan@sidley.com> *Date: *Friday, May 22, 2015 at 5:47 PM *To: *Client Committee <cwg-client@icann.org> *Subject: *[client com] Separation Review and Related Documents from Sidley
Dear All,
Attached please find the following documents:
1. Our comments to the Separation Process document.
2. An updated document addressing CCWG dependencies to reflect the Separation Process.
This document is an extract from the CCWG proposal and is marked to show proposed changes. Consider whether you would want to communicate these new dependencies to CCWG through a comment letter to their proposal.
3. A revised punch list document.
Please note that this is not Staff-maintained punch list. Instead it is the Sidley version where we added in the inputs we received from Greg from the design teams. We also attach a redline so Staff can see what changes we are proposing and those changes can be carried over to the master punch list being maintained by Staff. A few notes on the punch list:
a. We have identified new items arising out of the design team input (those are in yellow);
b. We have added the PTI item we discussed regarding input from ICANN finance/tax on the tax exempt status of PTI (#1A); and
c. We suggested specific wording changes to the CWG proposal to address the design team inputs on the punch list.
Grace – could you please forward to CWG?
Best regards,
Holly, Sharon and Josh
*SHARON* *FLANAGAN* Partner
Sidley Austin LLP 555 California Street Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94104 +1.415.772.1271 sflanagan@sidley.com www.sidley.com
[image: http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png] <http://www.sidley.com/> *SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP*
**************************************************************************************************** This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately.
**************************************************************************************************** _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
participants (3)
-
Cheryl Langdon-Orr -
Gomes, Chuck -
Grace Abuhamad