Notes, Recordings, Transcript DT-IPR Meeting on 24 November
Dear all, The notes, recordings and transcripts for the DT-IPR Meeting on 24 November 2015 will be available here: https://community.icann.org/x/QLpYAw A copy of the notes and action items may be found below. Kind regards, Brenda Action Items * Action (ICANN staff): Provide the DT-IPR with a cost estimate for setting up and running a trust with the three communities as beneficiaries. * Action (ICANN staff): Provide answers regarding what trademarks are currently owned by ICANN and whether ICANN has licensed out any trademarks? If yes, what QC has ICANN conducted on the licensed trademarks? Are these still outstanding questions that the DT-IPR has? * Action (ICANN staff): Doodle for Tuesday or Wednesday DT-IPR call Notes Link to google doc: <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZGSlKj-JSXe4T0wWv-hN6srDVOwhRJvQZzRpkGAA...> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZGSlKj-JSXe4T0wWv-hN6srDVOwhRJvQZzRpkGAA... We will be working live from the Google doc today. Please join the collaborative document in "suggestion mode". For now, no need to raise hands in the AC room to speak: just speak up as needed.
Hi, Because I'm apparently incompetent at modern GUIs, I had this in my calendar later. But this is good, because it'll give us a chance to try working on the mailing list more completely.
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZGSlKj-JSXe4T0wWv-hN6srDVOwhRJvQZzRpkGAA...>
I'm going through this. There's now a note on I.1.a that staff are to come up with a number for how much it'll cost to run a new trust. I'm assuming this is a diligence matter, and that we're all aware of the start up cost in political, rather than monetary, terms that such a trust would exact. Please tell me we don't take the "cost" problem as even remotely a gating factor. ICANN's Dublin meeting, according to the numbers projected during the Plenary and Riverdance Spectacle, exceeded IETF's annual budget. I'm pretty sure we can find a way to fund the trust if we need to. The real question is whether we can design one widely acceptable in just a few months. Item I.2 doesn't seem to have reached closure, whereas I think we need to answer the question in the opening. What's the barrier here? I'm alarmed by the text that has appeard in VI.1. It seems to be talking about "separation" of the assets from the Owner. I think this is totally incoherent, unless I misunderstand everything Greg has ever said about trade marks. The owner of the trade mark owns it, period. I don't see how you can have a rule by which someone else (who is not a government) has the ability to take some ownership interest away. Can someone please explain? A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
Hello, I find that the list of requirements is growing gradually and it begs to ask what the goal is, anyway I have added a few comments on the Gdocs. That said, it may be good to hear staff experience on what activities they do currently in maintaining the TM. While I appreciate processes, from the document shared, it feels like there is a lot of cosmetic requirements that is being introduced which IMO may not add any significance advantage towards ensuring that the owner provides access to the TM. Regards Sent from my Asus Zenfone2 Kindly excuse brevity and typos. On 24 Nov 2015 23:50, "Brenda Brewer" <brenda.brewer@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all,
The notes, recordings and transcripts for the DT-IPR Meeting on 24 November 2015 will be available here: https://community.icann.org/x/QLpYAw
A copy of the notes and action items may be found below.
Kind regards,
Brenda
[image: ---] *Action Items*
· *Action (ICANN staff): Provide the DT-IPR with a cost estimate for setting up and running a trust with the three communities as beneficiaries.*
· *Action (ICANN staff): Provide answers regarding what trademarks are currently owned by ICANN and whether ICANN has licensed out any trademarks? If yes, what QC has ICANN conducted on the licensed trademarks? Are these still outstanding questions that the DT-IPR has?*
· *Action (ICANN staff): Doodle for Tuesday or Wednesday DT-IPR call * *Notes*
Link to google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZGSlKj-JSXe4T0wWv-hN6srDVOwhRJvQZzRpkGAA...
We will be working live from the Google doc today. Please join the collaborative document in "suggestion mode".
For now, no need to raise hands in the AC room to speak: just speak up as needed.
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
participants (3)
-
Andrew Sullivan -
Brenda Brewer -
Seun Ojedeji