Communication with numbers and protocol parameters groups
All: Are there people in this group who are in a position to liaise with, coordinate with and/or provide information to and from the other two groups preparing responses for their respective communities? I think opening a "horizontal" channel would be most helpful in our work. Greg Shatan
Just a question perhaps avri can clear me on that. Doesn't the group setup by icann have all these stakeholders. Will we not be replicating the same here ? Just thinking loud. Kris Seeburn skype: kris_seeburn30 Linkedin:mu.linkedin.com/in/kseeburn
On Oct 16, 2014, at 10:32 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
All:
Are there people in this group who are in a position to liaise with, coordinate with and/or provide information to and from the other two groups preparing responses for their respective communities?
I think opening a "horizontal" channel would be most helpful in our work.
Greg Shatan
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
Actually I don’t think it would be anything but a distraction at this point. What this group needs to do is develop a proposal based on the ICG RFP. I am conversant with what is happening in the protocol parameters community and could liaise with them, but it is hard for me to see how a ‘horizontal channel’ to that would help you develop a proposal. Of course, if, during the development of a proposal, specific questions arise about its compatibility with the protocol parameters IANA or the numbers IANA, then we can reach out to them. But for now, you just need to develop a proposal regarding the DNS root and the end of NTIA’s role in overseeing that. From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Greg Shatan Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 11:33 AM To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Communication with numbers and protocol parameters groups All: Are there people in this group who are in a position to liaise with, coordinate with and/or provide information to and from the other two groups preparing responses for their respective communities? I think opening a "horizontal" channel would be most helpful in our work. Greg Shatan
Thats what i thought as well. It may be more distraction than anythin else. I would argue rightly we get things rolling and then if required we can cut across. Kris Seeburn skype: kris_seeburn30 Linkedin:mu.linkedin.com/in/kseeburn
On Oct 16, 2014, at 10:57 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> wrote:
Actually I don’t think it would be anything but a distraction at this point. What this group needs to do is develop a proposal based on the ICG RFP. I am conversant with what is happening in the protocol parameters community and could liaise with them, but it is hard for me to see how a ‘horizontal channel’ to that would help you develop a proposal. Of course, if, during the development of a proposal, specific questions arise about its compatibility with the protocol parameters IANA or the numbers IANA, then we can reach out to them. But for now, you just need to develop a proposal regarding the DNS root and the end of NTIA’s role in overseeing that.
From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Greg Shatan Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 11:33 AM To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Communication with numbers and protocol parameters groups
All:
Are there people in this group who are in a position to liaise with, coordinate with and/or provide information to and from the other two groups preparing responses for their respective communities?
I think opening a "horizontal" channel would be most helpful in our work.
Greg Shatan
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
+1 however the ICG should start thinking of how they are gonna work around developing a single functional oversight proposal. Cheers! On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> wrote:
Actually I don’t think it would be anything but a distraction at this point. What this group needs to do is develop a proposal based on the ICG RFP. I am conversant with what is happening in the protocol parameters community and could liaise with them, but it is hard for me to see how a ‘horizontal channel’ to that would help you develop a proposal. Of course, if, during the development of a proposal, specific questions arise about its compatibility with the protocol parameters IANA or the numbers IANA, then we can reach out to them. But for now, you just need to develop a proposal regarding the DNS root and the end of NTIA’s role in overseeing that.
*From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Greg Shatan *Sent:* Thursday, October 16, 2014 11:33 AM *To:* cwg-stewardship@icann.org *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] Communication with numbers and protocol parameters groups
All:
Are there people in this group who are in a position to liaise with, coordinate with and/or provide information to and from the other two groups preparing responses for their respective communities?
I think opening a "horizontal" channel would be most helpful in our work.
Greg Shatan
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng <seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng>* The key to understanding is humility - my view !
Leave that to the ICG. Out of scope here ;-) From: Seun Ojedeji [mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 12:10 PM To: Milton L Mueller Cc: Greg Shatan; cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Communication with numbers and protocol parameters groups +1 however the ICG should start thinking of how they are gonna work around developing a single functional oversight proposal. Cheers! On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu<mailto:mueller@syr.edu>> wrote: Actually I don’t think it would be anything but a distraction at this point. What this group needs to do is develop a proposal based on the ICG RFP. I am conversant with what is happening in the protocol parameters community and could liaise with them, but it is hard for me to see how a ‘horizontal channel’ to that would help you develop a proposal. Of course, if, during the development of a proposal, specific questions arise about its compatibility with the protocol parameters IANA or the numbers IANA, then we can reach out to them. But for now, you just need to develop a proposal regarding the DNS root and the end of NTIA’s role in overseeing that. From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org>] On Behalf Of Greg Shatan Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 11:33 AM To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Communication with numbers and protocol parameters groups All: Are there people in this group who are in a position to liaise with, coordinate with and/or provide information to and from the other two groups preparing responses for their respective communities? I think opening a "horizontal" channel would be most helpful in our work. Greg Shatan _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Seun Ojedeji, Federal University Oye-Ekiti web: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng Mobile: +2348035233535 alt email: <http://goog_1872880453> seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng<mailto:seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng> The key to understanding is humility - my view !
+ 1
On Oct 16, 2014, at 11:15 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> wrote:
Leave that to the ICG. Out of scope here ;-) <> From: Seun Ojedeji [mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 12:10 PM To: Milton L Mueller Cc: Greg Shatan; cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Communication with numbers and protocol parameters groups
+1 however the ICG should start thinking of how they are gonna work around developing a single functional oversight proposal.
Cheers!
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu <mailto:mueller@syr.edu>> wrote: Actually I don’t think it would be anything but a distraction at this point. What this group needs to do is develop a proposal based on the ICG RFP. I am conversant with what is happening in the protocol parameters community and could liaise with them, but it is hard for me to see how a ‘horizontal channel’ to that would help you develop a proposal. Of course, if, during the development of a proposal, specific questions arise about its compatibility with the protocol parameters IANA or the numbers IANA, then we can reach out to them. But for now, you just need to develop a proposal regarding the DNS root and the end of NTIA’s role in overseeing that. <> From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org <mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org <mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org>] On Behalf Of Greg Shatan Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 11:33 AM To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org <mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Communication with numbers and protocol parameters groups
All:
Are there people in this group who are in a position to liaise with, coordinate with and/or provide information to and from the other two groups preparing responses for their respective communities?
I think opening a "horizontal" channel would be most helpful in our work.
Greg Shatan
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org <mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship>
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Seun Ojedeji, Federal University Oye-Ekiti web: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng/> Mobile: +2348035233535 alt email: <http://goog_1872880453/>seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng <mailto:seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng> The key to understanding is humility - my view !
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
Kris Seeburn seeburn.k@gmail.com www.linkedin.com/in/kseeburn/ <http://www.linkedin.com/in/kseeburn/>
participants (5)
-
Greg Shatan -
Kris Seeburn -
Krishna Seeburn
-
Milton L Mueller -
Seun Ojedeji