Dear all, The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA Call #49 - 26 May are available here: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=53774450 Kind regards, Brenda Action Items Action: staff to collect actions and color-code for DT Action: (Grace) to follow up with ICANN Legal for timeline of response for any question on Punch List that is pending response ACTION: Client Committee: Put out a description of what we have, include key-decisions and main questions Notes Schedule for high intensity (all times in UTC) Thursday 28 May 11:00 - 13:00 15:00 - 17:00 19:00 - 21:00 Friday 29 May 07:00 - 09:00 10:00 - 12:00 14:00 - 16:00 Upcoming dates & milestones * 2 June CWG-Stewardship meeting * 4 June CWG-Stewardship meeting * 8 June -- submission to SO/ACs * 9 June CWG-Stewardship meeting * 11 June -- absolute last date for SO/AC consideration for BA ("drop dead" date) * 21-25 June -- ICANN 53 in Buenos Aires Notes: Olivier on phone only for now Lise sends apologies for today 1. Opening Remarks Overview of agenda 2. Public comment * * 53 submissions received -- possible more submissions until 23:59 UTC today (for translation extension) * CWG to review and consider the following questions: Any comments missed (in terms of action items)? Any actions that are already addressed? Any incomplete responses? * These are draft responses provided by staff but subject to CWG-Stewardship review * Clarifications: 2 submissions (KISA and Norid) were duplicates and will be corrected shortly. These submissions were not duplicates in the review analysis. Also, for issues with reading PDF templates, please download & save the document (this should resolve the issue) * Freeze numbering as listed in 26 May version * Weighting comments by group/individual -- difficult to do, but perhaps best solution is to separate analysis by individual / group and see if there are any differences between those. * Focus on substance of comments Action: staff to collect actions and color-code for DT 3. Punch List Action: (Grace) to follow up with ICANN Legal for timeline of response for any question on Punch List that is pending response Item: PTI Board (item 4 and 5) - Discussed, in context of PTI being subsidiary and separability, and holding ICANN accountable What is missing a holistic view of where we are at the moment: Need to capture where we are at this stage of discussion. Suggestion: ask Sidley such a document? Put out a description of what we have, include key-decisions and main questions Use Client committee to discuss ACTION: Client Committee Item 20: SLE Update DT-A DT-A work in conjunction with IANA to document properly. Start with high-level approach. Progress made. Optimistic about reaching 8 June deadline Item 6-10 , IANA Function review DT-N Item 11- 16 A (CSC, DT-C) Additional questions Sidley (highlighted in yellow) Item 17 -19 Term Sheet * * Based on first public document * Blue language : * Black language: substantive items and comments to consider * Comparison an differences to IANA contract * Reference to proposal * What kind of feed-back is expected? * Provide comments and responses to questions or make own revisions * Advise Sidley: (Set-up) Design team that is responsible for term sheet, to take up the pen.and revise this version. Challenge: no Design team assigned. Item for discussion: How to develop Term Sheet as part of implementation part of the proposal. ITEM 30-31 RZM Why are they on the Punch List? Suggestion to close them out Suggestion to be marked on Punch List Item 32 to stay on list Re-format Punch List to make it more usable 4. Forward planning (including high intensity) No comments 5. Instructions to Sidley a. Costs to date b. Scope of work Is scope still accurate? Is there future role (post submission to chartering organizations)? c. Role for Sidley in BA? d. Future role? Implementation? 6. AOB a. WSIS update (Olivier Crepin-Leblond) CCWG IG closely works with ICANN. Session on Wednesday at WSIS, showcase ICG, CWG Stewardship, Crisp and IANAPlan groups. CCWG IG showcase work as well at IGF in November Goal is to inform audience on process. First draft for panel to staff. Question: provide feed-back in order to ensure process is adequately presented at WSIS, preferably by Wednesday COB. 7. Closing Remarks Call closed at 19.00 UTC