Thanks Chuck and Jonathan. Jonathan's suggestion is fine so long as the Co-Chairs are okay with it, as I think it may be asking too much from volunteers. Putting other people instead distributes the workload and improves diversity. Overall my preference would have been not to put members of the PTI Board on CCG. Regards Sent from my LG G4 Kindly excuse brevity and typos On 10 Sep 2016 15:51, "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote: Seun, Please note that the drafting of the letter of appointment (as per the action you refer to) does not in any way pre-suppose the names of the actual appointees. As the call records will show, I put a strawman out for the IANA IPR Group as the initial appointees for the CCG reps; 2 x Co-chairs (of CWG) plus Greg Shatan (as CCG Co-Chair). Any other suggestions / proposals are clearly very welcome. Jonathan *From:* Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@verisign.com] *Sent:* 10 September 2016 13:51 *To:* Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>; Brenda Brewer < brenda.brewer@icann.org> *Cc:* cwg-stewardship@icann.org *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CCG Reps for names community Seun, Note that it was suggested that Greg Shatan serve as one of the interim CCG members; if we do that, it clearly would satisfy your recommendation that “a third interim member is selected from the intellectual property constituency ”. Chuck *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship- bounces@icann.org <cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Seun Ojedeji *Sent:* Saturday, September 10, 2016 4:46 AM *To:* Brenda Brewer *Cc:* cwg-stewardship@icann.org *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] CCG Reps for names community Sent from my LG G4 Kindly excuse brevity and typos On 10 Sep 2016 9:05 a.m., "Brenda Brewer" <brenda.brewer@icann.org> wrote:

Discussed selection of CCG representatives. Suggestion that CWG co-chairs act as interim CCG reps until a process is figured out by the chartering organizations.

SO: Like I raised on the call, I think we may be putting too much responsibilities on the Co-Chairs who are volunteers. I expect quite a lot of developmental/setup activity will commence once these various groups are formed, which may imply significant amount of time commitment. I will like to suggest we select other members within the CWG to serve as interim instead. However, whoever we select should include someone from the intellectual property constituency as I think this would be their area of strength. The interims should agree to report to the CWG/COs and make decisions based on their approval.

ACTION (Client committee): instruct Sidley to draft a letter of appointment of CCG reps.

SO: I left the room during this discussion, does the action above imply that it has been concluded that we use the Co-Chairs? If that is the case, I suggest a third interim member is selected from the intellectual property constituency. On a much lighter note, i hope it has been clarified that there is no possible conflict in having PTI board members serve as CCG members. Regards

5. AOB

IRP will be functional by the time of the transition

ACTION (CGWG): monitor development of IRP

Next meeting 15 Sep @06:00UTC

_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship