Re: [CWG-Stewardship] TIME TO GET GOING RPC GROUP III
Hi Allan, I'm no Marika, but I can provide the answer to your first point. We have checked with our web team internally and the Wiki was the suggested tool. We created sub-team sections in the Wiki for that purpose, and could of course adjust them to what best suits the group for collaborative work. The other option would be something like Google Docs, which I could support you in, but is not a platform supported by the ICANN web team. From: Allan MacGillivray <allan.macgillivray@cira.ca> Date: Thursday, October 30, 2014 2:37 PM To: "cwg-stewardship@icann.org" <cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] TIME TO GET GOING RPC GROUP III Colleagues we are quickly running out of time, Group III has to get its act together, and quickly. This is what I think we need right away: 1. A platform for collaboration We need a place specific proposals can be uploaded which has the capability of capturing the comments of the community all in one place. Marika can you suggest something. My fear is that a lot of what is being said on the list will have to be repeated Marika can you suggest something? 2. A common understanding of what we are trying to achieve. Many of the ideas that are being floated may be based on differing assumptions as to the objective. This has to be a priority for putting up in our collaboration space¹ 3. Specific Proposals from Group III participants We need fleshed out proposals that can be reviewed and commented on in a structured manner. I propose that we use a simple pro and con¹ approach. 4. Someone to call the first meeting Whoever you are, you will likely end up as the rapporteur/coordinator unless you can convince someone else to do it but unless someone volunteers, we will not accomplish anything
Hi, Thanks Grace, and thanks Allan for bringing this up. Would a combination of Google Docs and the Wiki be acceptable? Perhaps use Google Docs for collaborative drafting, then use the Wiki to post drafted documents and eliciting feedback from the broader community? The combination of the two had been previously suggested. Thanks again. Amr On Oct 30, 2014, at 7:54 PM, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org> wrote:
Hi Allan,
I'm no Marika, but I can provide the answer to your first point. We have checked with our web team internally and the Wiki was the suggested tool. We created sub-team sections in the Wiki for that purpose, and could of course adjust them to what best suits the group for collaborative work. The other option would be something like Google Docs, which I could support you in, but is not a platform supported by the ICANN web team.
From: Allan MacGillivray <allan.macgillivray@cira.ca> Date: Thursday, October 30, 2014 2:37 PM To: "cwg-stewardship@icann.org" <cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] TIME TO GET GOING RPC GROUP III
Colleagues – we are quickly running out of time, Group III has to get its act together, and quickly. This is what I think we need right away:
1. A platform for collaboration
We need a place specific proposals can be uploaded which has the capability of capturing the comments of the community all in one place. Marika – can you suggest something. My fear is that a lot of what is being said on the list will have to be repeated
Marika – can you suggest something?
2. A common understanding of what we are trying to achieve.
Many of the ideas that are being floated may be based on differing assumptions as to the objective. This has to be a priority for putting up in our ‘collaboration space’
3. Specific Proposals from Group III participants
We need fleshed out proposals that can be reviewed and commented on in a structured manner. I propose that we use a simple ‘pro and con’ approach.
4. Someone to call the first meeting
Whoever you are, you will likely end up as the rapporteur/coordinator unless you can convince someone else to do it but unless someone volunteers, we will not accomplish anything
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
I agree, google docs allows us to collaborate easier but the drafts belong on a more controlled platform. -James On 30 Oct 2014, at 19:12, Tracy Hackshaw @ Google <tracyhackshaw@gmail.com<mailto:tracyhackshaw@gmail.com>> wrote: This approach suggested by Amr sounds optimal. /t Sent from BlackBerry Q10 From: Amr Elsadr Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:09 PM To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] TIME TO GET GOING RPC GROUP III Hi, Thanks Grace, and thanks Allan for bringing this up. Would a combination of Google Docs and the Wiki be acceptable? Perhaps use Google Docs for collaborative drafting, then use the Wiki to post drafted documents and eliciting feedback from the broader community? The combination of the two had been previously suggested. Thanks again. Amr On Oct 30, 2014, at 7:54 PM, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org<mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org>> wrote: Hi Allan, I'm no Marika, but I can provide the answer to your first point. We have checked with our web team internally and the Wiki was the suggested tool. We created sub-team sections in the Wiki for that purpose, and could of course adjust them to what best suits the group for collaborative work. The other option would be something like Google Docs, which I could support you in, but is not a platform supported by the ICANN web team. From: Allan MacGillivray <allan.macgillivray@cira.ca<mailto:allan.macgillivray@cira.ca>> Date: Thursday, October 30, 2014 2:37 PM To: "cwg-stewardship@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org>" <cwg-stewardship@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org>> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] TIME TO GET GOING RPC GROUP III Colleagues – we are quickly running out of time, Group III has to get its act together, and quickly. This is what I think we need right away: 1. A platform for collaboration We need a place specific proposals can be uploaded which has the capability of capturing the comments of the community all in one place. Marika – can you suggest something. My fear is that a lot of what is being said on the list will have to be repeated Marika – can you suggest something? 2. A common understanding of what we are trying to achieve. Many of the ideas that are being floated may be based on differing assumptions as to the objective. This has to be a priority for putting up in our ‘collaboration space’ 3. Specific Proposals from Group III participants We need fleshed out proposals that can be reviewed and commented on in a structured manner. I propose that we use a simple ‘pro and con’ approach. 4. Someone to call the first meeting Whoever you are, you will likely end up as the rapporteur/coordinator unless you can convince someone else to do it but unless someone volunteers, we will not accomplish anything _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
That approach sounds good to me as well. Greg On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:11 PM, James Gannon <james@cyberinvasion.net> wrote:
I agree, google docs allows us to collaborate easier but the drafts belong on a more controlled platform.
-James
On 30 Oct 2014, at 19:12, Tracy Hackshaw @ Google < tracyhackshaw@gmail.com> wrote:
This approach suggested by Amr sounds optimal.
/t
Sent from BlackBerry Q10 *From: *Amr Elsadr *Sent: *Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:09 PM *To: *cwg-stewardship@icann.org *Subject: *Re: [CWG-Stewardship] TIME TO GET GOING RPC GROUP III
Hi,
Thanks Grace, and thanks Allan for bringing this up.
Would a combination of Google Docs and the Wiki be acceptable? Perhaps use Google Docs for collaborative drafting, then use the Wiki to post drafted documents and eliciting feedback from the broader community? The combination of the two had been previously suggested.
Thanks again.
Amr
On Oct 30, 2014, at 7:54 PM, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org> wrote:
Hi Allan,
I'm no Marika, but I can provide the answer to your first point. We have checked with our web team internally and the Wiki was the suggested tool. We created sub-team sections in the Wiki for that purpose, and could of course adjust them to what best suits the group for collaborative work. The other option would be something like Google Docs, which I could support you in, but is not a platform supported by the ICANN web team.
From: Allan MacGillivray <allan.macgillivray@cira.ca> Date: Thursday, October 30, 2014 2:37 PM To: "cwg-stewardship@icann.org" <cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] TIME TO GET GOING RPC GROUP III
Colleagues – we are quickly running out of time, Group III has to get its act together, and quickly. This is what I think we need right away:
1. *A platform for collaboration*
We need a place specific proposals can be uploaded which has the capability of capturing the comments of the community all in one place. Marika – can you suggest something. My fear is that a lot of what is being said on the list will have to be repeated
*Marika – can you suggest something?* 2. *A common understanding of what we are trying to achieve*.
Many of the ideas that are being floated may be based on differing assumptions as to the objective. This has to be a priority for putting up in our ‘collaboration space’
3. *Specific Proposals from Group III participants*
We need fleshed out proposals that can be reviewed and commented on in a structured manner. I propose that we use a simple ‘pro and con’ approach.
4. *Someone to call the first meeting*
Whoever you are, you will likely end up as the rapporteur/coordinator unless you can convince someone else to do it but unless someone volunteers, we will not accomplish anything
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
+1 Mary Uduma On Friday, October 31, 2014 4:10 AM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@egyptig.org> wrote: Hi, Thanks Grace, and thanks Allan for bringing this up. Would a combination of Google Docs and the Wiki be acceptable? Perhaps use Google Docs for collaborative drafting, then use the Wiki to post drafted documents and eliciting feedback from the broader community? The combination of the two had been previously suggested. Thanks again. Amr On Oct 30, 2014, at 7:54 PM, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org> wrote: Hi Allan,
I'm no Marika, but I can provide the answer to your first point. We have checked with our web team internally and the Wiki was the suggested tool. We created sub-team sections in the Wiki for that purpose, and could of course adjust them to what best suits the group for collaborative work. The other option would be something like Google Docs, which I could support you in, but is not a platform supported by the ICANN web team.
From: Allan MacGillivray <allan.macgillivray@cira.ca> Date: Thursday, October 30, 2014 2:37 PM To: "cwg-stewardship@icann.org" <cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] TIME TO GET GOING RPC GROUP III
Colleagues – we are quickly running out of time, Group III has to get its act together, and quickly. This is what I think we need right away: 1. A platform for collaboration We need a place specific proposals can be uploaded which has the capability of capturing the comments of the community all in one place. Marika – can you suggest something. My fear is that a lot of what is being said on the list will have to be repeated Marika – can you suggest something? 2. A common understanding of what we are trying to achieve.
Many of the ideas that are being floated may be based on differing assumptions as to the objective. This has to be a priority for putting up in our ‘collaboration space’
3. Specific Proposals from Group III participants
We need fleshed out proposals that can be reviewed and commented on in a structured manner. I propose that we use a simple ‘pro and con’ approach.
4. Someone to call the first meeting
Whoever you are, you will likely end up as the rapporteur/coordinator unless you can convince someone else to do it but unless someone volunteers, we will not accomplish anything
_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
Amr: I like your approach. Google for document repository/drafting collaboration and the WIKI to capture all comments/feedback and whatever else. -ed On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@egyptig.org> wrote:
Hi,
Thanks Grace, and thanks Allan for bringing this up.
Would a combination of Google Docs and the Wiki be acceptable? Perhaps use Google Docs for collaborative drafting, then use the Wiki to post drafted documents and eliciting feedback from the broader community? The combination of the two had been previously suggested.
Thanks again.
Amr
On Oct 30, 2014, at 7:54 PM, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org> wrote:
Hi Allan,
I'm no Marika, but I can provide the answer to your first point. We have checked with our web team internally and the Wiki was the suggested tool. We created sub-team sections in the Wiki for that purpose, and could of course adjust them to what best suits the group for collaborative work. The other option would be something like Google Docs, which I could support you in, but is not a platform supported by the ICANN web team.
From: Allan MacGillivray <allan.macgillivray@cira.ca> Date: Thursday, October 30, 2014 2:37 PM To: "cwg-stewardship@icann.org" <cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] TIME TO GET GOING RPC GROUP III
Colleagues – we are quickly running out of time, Group III has to get its act together, and quickly. This is what I think we need right away:
1. *A platform for collaboration*
We need a place specific proposals can be uploaded which has the capability of capturing the comments of the community all in one place. Marika – can you suggest something. My fear is that a lot of what is being said on the list will have to be repeated
*Marika – can you suggest something?* 2. *A common understanding of what we are trying to achieve*.
Many of the ideas that are being floated may be based on differing assumptions as to the objective. This has to be a priority for putting up in our ‘collaboration space’
3. *Specific Proposals from Group III participants*
We need fleshed out proposals that can be reviewed and commented on in a structured manner. I propose that we use a simple ‘pro and con’ approach.
4. *Someone to call the first meeting*
Whoever you are, you will likely end up as the rapporteur/coordinator unless you can convince someone else to do it but unless someone volunteers, we will not accomplish anything
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
-- *NOTICE:* This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately.
Thanks, but actually…, it was Cheryl who first suggested combining the two during our call last week. I’m also just agreeing with her. Just sayin’!! :-) Thanks again. Amr On Oct 31, 2014, at 3:47 PM, Eduardo Diaz <eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com> wrote:
Amr:
I like your approach. Google for document repository/drafting collaboration and the WIKI to capture all comments/feedback and whatever else.
-ed
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@egyptig.org> wrote: Hi,
Thanks Grace, and thanks Allan for bringing this up.
Would a combination of Google Docs and the Wiki be acceptable? Perhaps use Google Docs for collaborative drafting, then use the Wiki to post drafted documents and eliciting feedback from the broader community? The combination of the two had been previously suggested.
Thanks again.
Amr
On Oct 30, 2014, at 7:54 PM, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org> wrote:
Hi Allan,
I'm no Marika, but I can provide the answer to your first point. We have checked with our web team internally and the Wiki was the suggested tool. We created sub-team sections in the Wiki for that purpose, and could of course adjust them to what best suits the group for collaborative work. The other option would be something like Google Docs, which I could support you in, but is not a platform supported by the ICANN web team.
From: Allan MacGillivray <allan.macgillivray@cira.ca> Date: Thursday, October 30, 2014 2:37 PM To: "cwg-stewardship@icann.org" <cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] TIME TO GET GOING RPC GROUP III
Colleagues – we are quickly running out of time, Group III has to get its act together, and quickly. This is what I think we need right away:
1. A platform for collaboration
We need a place specific proposals can be uploaded which has the capability of capturing the comments of the community all in one place. Marika – can you suggest something. My fear is that a lot of what is being said on the list will have to be repeated
Marika – can you suggest something?
2. A common understanding of what we are trying to achieve.
Many of the ideas that are being floated may be based on differing assumptions as to the objective. This has to be a priority for putting up in our ‘collaboration space’
3. Specific Proposals from Group III participants
We need fleshed out proposals that can be reviewed and commented on in a structured manner. I propose that we use a simple ‘pro and con’ approach.
4. Someone to call the first meeting
Whoever you are, you will likely end up as the rapporteur/coordinator unless you can convince someone else to do it but unless someone volunteers, we will not accomplish anything
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
-- NOTICE: This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately.
participants (7)
-
Amr Elsadr -
Eduardo Diaz -
Grace Abuhamad -
Greg Shatan -
James Gannon -
Mary Uduma -
Tracy Hackshaw ＠ Google