Chuck, Good points. In both cases, they could broadly be viewed as implementation but agreed, more specific information on what, if any, progress is being made could be useful. My understanding is as follows: 1. The CWG needs to undertake the work to define the requirements for a home for the IANA intellectual property. We should maintain open communication with the other OC's whilst doing so. Then we can test any proposed solutions to housing the IP against those requirements. 2. ON SLEs, there should be work being done but not necessarily by the CWG at this stage. An update would be helpful. Is this consistent with your / others understanding? A related point to check, once we have a common understanding, is whether or not our implementation schedule reflects this understanding. Thanks, Jonathan From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@verisign.com] Sent: 12 October 2015 13:32 To: jrobinson@afilias.info; cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: RE: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG IANA - Proposed Meeting 17:00 UTC Tuesday 12 Oct - CANCELLATION Thanks Lise and Jonathan. I don't think a meeting is needed for this but it seems to me that it would be very helpful for us to get updates between now and our meeting in Dublin regarding the following: 1. IANA domain name and trademarks 2. SLEs In both cases my understanding was that work needs to be done but I haven't heard much about either in quite a while. Chuck From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org <mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 6:50 AM To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org <mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG IANA - Proposed Meeting 17:00 UTC Tuesday 12 Oct - CANCELLATION All, We have reviewed the current position of the CWG and taken account of general ICANN Community workload. On the basis of both, the co-chairs propose to CANCEL the scheduled meeting of the CWG tomorrow at 17:00 UTC. Looking forward to next week and the planned meeting for Wed 21 October at 08h30 UTC (09h30 local time in Dublin), we propose to cover the following: 1. Implementation a. CWG IANA Role b. Interface with ICANN project staff 2. CCWG a. Progress update b. Issues for the CWG 3. Legal Matters a. Progress update - Bylaws drafting? b. Issues for the CWG 4. AOB We look forward to meeting with you in person if you are able to travel to Dublin and, if not, to meeting with you as usual on Wednesday next week. Thank-you. Lise & Jonathan -- Lise Fuhr & Jonathan Robinson Co-chairs, CWG IANA

I would also note that tomorrow is Tuesday, October 13 (not 12)..... On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:

Jonathan,

This is consistent with my understanding. On point 1, the next question is, when should we start this work?

Greg

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Jonathan Robinson < jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:

...

Chuck,

Good points. In both cases, they could broadly be viewed as implementation but agreed, more specific information on what, if any, progress is being made could be useful.

My understanding is as follows:

1. The CWG needs to undertake the work to define the requirements for a home for the IANA intellectual property. We should maintain open communication with the other OC’s whilst doing so. Then we can test any proposed solutions to housing the IP against those requirements.

2. ON SLEs, there should be work being done but not necessarily by the CWG at this stage. An update would be helpful.

Is this consistent with your / others understanding?

A related point to check, once we have a common understanding, is whether or not our implementation schedule reflects this understanding.

Thanks,

Jonathan

*From:* Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@verisign.com] *Sent:* 12 October 2015 13:32 *To:* jrobinson@afilias.info; cwg-stewardship@icann.org *Subject:* RE: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG IANA - Proposed Meeting 17:00 UTC Tuesday 12 Oct - CANCELLATION

Thanks Lise and Jonathan. I don’t think a meeting is needed for this but it seems to me that it would be very helpful for us to get updates between now and our meeting in Dublin regarding the following:

1. IANA domain name and trademarks

2. SLEs

In both cases my understanding was that work needs to be done but I haven’t heard much about either in quite a while.

Chuck

*From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [ mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org <cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Robinson *Sent:* Monday, October 12, 2015 6:50 AM *To:* cwg-stewardship@icann.org *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] CWG IANA - Proposed Meeting 17:00 UTC Tuesday 12 Oct - CANCELLATION

All,

We have reviewed the current position of the CWG and taken account of general ICANN Community workload.

On the basis of both, the co-chairs propose to CANCEL the scheduled meeting of the CWG tomorrow at 17:00 UTC.

Looking forward to next week and the planned meeting for Wed 21 October at 08h30 UTC (09h30 local time in Dublin), we propose to cover the following:

1. Implementation

a. CWG IANA Role

b. Interface with ICANN project staff

2. CCWG

a. Progress update

b. Issues for the CWG

3. Legal Matters

a. Progress update – Bylaws drafting?

b. Issues for the CWG

4. AOB

We look forward to meeting with you in person if you are able to travel to Dublin and, if not, to meeting with you as usual on Wednesday next week.

Thank-you.

Lise & Jonathan

--

Lise Fuhr & Jonathan Robinson

Co-chairs, CWG IANA

_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship