Slides and Agenda for the GAC-GNSO Facilitated Dialogue on IGO Protections
Hello All, It has taken me a whole to think about how best to facilitate a discussion on this complex topic. Attached are some slides that set context and also a flow for discussion. I propose to break the discussion into 4 phases. We may not have time to cover all the phases. The phases are: (1) Reservation - clarify current provisions around reservation of names, and also get input from both GAC and GNSO on this topic (2) Notice - clarify the positions of the GNSO and GAC on the form and duration of notice when an IGO acronym is registered (3) Dispute resolution - this is the subject of a current PDP and an initial report has been published with Draft recommendations. This will allow the PDP to take input from the GAC and the working party members to explain how they have taken the GAC advice into account so far (4) Appeals - this is the subject of a current PDP and an initial report has been published with Draft recommendations. This will allow the PDP to take input from the GAC and the working party members to explain how they have taken the GAC advice into account so far. I will be available at 6pm outside the meeting room for anyone that wants to get together and run through the agenda. The style will be similar to the style of the session on Saturday morning. On each topic I will ask the GAC and GNSO delegations to comment, and may suggest some ideas for resolving the conflict. Regards, Bruce Tonkin
Bruce: As you used the acronym PAM in the slides, I thought members of the discussion group would find this of relevant interest (PAM is a registered trademark for a very popular non-stick cooking spray in the United States) -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PAM_(cooking_oil) Best, Philip Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal Virtualaw LLC 1155 F Street, NW Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20004 202-559-8597/Direct 202-559-8750/Fax 202-255-6172/cell "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey ________________________________________ From: discussion-igo-rc-bounces@icann.org [discussion-igo-rc-bounces@icann.org] on behalf of Bruce Tonkin [Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au] Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2017 8:43 AM To: discussion-igo-rc@icann.org Subject: [Discussion-igo-rc] Slides and Agenda for the GAC-GNSO Facilitated Dialogue on IGO Protections Hello All, It has taken me a whole to think about how best to facilitate a discussion on this complex topic. Attached are some slides that set context and also a flow for discussion. I propose to break the discussion into 4 phases. We may not have time to cover all the phases. The phases are: (1) Reservation - clarify current provisions around reservation of names, and also get input from both GAC and GNSO on this topic (2) Notice - clarify the positions of the GNSO and GAC on the form and duration of notice when an IGO acronym is registered (3) Dispute resolution - this is the subject of a current PDP and an initial report has been published with Draft recommendations. This will allow the PDP to take input from the GAC and the working party members to explain how they have taken the GAC advice into account so far (4) Appeals - this is the subject of a current PDP and an initial report has been published with Draft recommendations. This will allow the PDP to take input from the GAC and the working party members to explain how they have taken the GAC advice into account so far. I will be available at 6pm outside the meeting room for anyone that wants to get together and run through the agenda. The style will be similar to the style of the session on Saturday morning. On each topic I will ask the GAC and GNSO delegations to comment, and may suggest some ideas for resolving the conflict. Regards, Bruce Tonkin
Indeed Phil. An excellent example of why reserving the IGO acronyms would not be feasible. There are many others... Cheers, Chris
On 12 Mar 2017, at 18:20, Phil Corwin <psc@vlaw-dc.com> wrote:
Bruce:
As you used the acronym PAM in the slides, I thought members of the discussion group would find this of relevant interest (PAM is a registered trademark for a very popular non-stick cooking spray in the United States) --
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PAM_(cooking_oil)
Best, Philip
Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/cell
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
________________________________________ From: discussion-igo-rc-bounces@icann.org [discussion-igo-rc-bounces@icann.org] on behalf of Bruce Tonkin [Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au] Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2017 8:43 AM To: discussion-igo-rc@icann.org Subject: [Discussion-igo-rc] Slides and Agenda for the GAC-GNSO Facilitated Dialogue on IGO Protections
Hello All,
It has taken me a whole to think about how best to facilitate a discussion on this complex topic.
Attached are some slides that set context and also a flow for discussion.
I propose to break the discussion into 4 phases. We may not have time to cover all the phases.
The phases are:
(1) Reservation - clarify current provisions around reservation of names, and also get input from both GAC and GNSO on this topic
(2) Notice - clarify the positions of the GNSO and GAC on the form and duration of notice when an IGO acronym is registered
(3) Dispute resolution - this is the subject of a current PDP and an initial report has been published with Draft recommendations. This will allow the PDP to take input from the GAC and the working party members to explain how they have taken the GAC advice into account so far
(4) Appeals - this is the subject of a current PDP and an initial report has been published with Draft recommendations. This will allow the PDP to take input from the GAC and the working party members to explain how they have taken the GAC advice into account so far.
I will be available at 6pm outside the meeting room for anyone that wants to get together and run through the agenda.
The style will be similar to the style of the session on Saturday morning. On each topic I will ask the GAC and GNSO delegations to comment, and may suggest some ideas for resolving the conflict.
Regards, Bruce Tonkin
_______________________________________________ Discussion-igo-rc mailing list Discussion-igo-rc@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion-igo-rc
participants (3)
-
Bruce Tonkin -
Chris Disspain -
Phil Corwin