I won't have time to send in comments, but will have ready for discussion.

On the .web funds, my reading was that they are CURRENTLY being held in a separate bank account pending investment, but that they would ultimately be combined with the other auction funds. Presuming court or other actions do not cause them to be refunded or otherwise dealt with.

Alan

At 31/08/2016 11:16 AM, Jonathan Robinson wrote:

All,
 
Two points.
 
First, thank-you to Sylvia for the recent review of the document.
 
Note also that I have done likewise today and have included a commented / further modified version (attached). I am willing to speak to these points as we work through the document tonight and do not expect that any suggested changes or additions will be seen as material or, at least, controversial.
 
Second, Afilias was a participant in the .web auction. There is a reported lawsuit around the outcome, which does not involve Afilias. Notwithstanding, I believe it is not appropriate for me to comment on or get involved with any discussions around the proceeds from the .web auction.
 
Talk with you all a little later.
 
 
Jonathan
 
From: Sylvia Cadena [ mailto:sylvia@apnic.net]
Sent: 31 August 2016 02:26
To: dt-cwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] Proposed Agenda - new gTLD Auction Proceeds DT meeting on Wednesday 31 August at 19.30 UTC
 
Thanks Marika. Happy to focus the discussion on the file β€œCCWG Auction Proceeds - Draft Charter - items for discussion - Updated 30 August 2016” which hopefully we will be able to finalize soon so that we can go through point 3 on the agenda.
 
I would like to ask if the proceeds of the .WEB are then considered as part of this process or not, or what implication has that they are held on a different account as per the message that Asha and Erika shared. It doesn’t have any implication right? As they are listed here http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/auctions/proceeds they are all considered part of the same fund. Right? I dont think that is an item for the agenda though, but just wanted to have some clarify about that.
 
Talk to you soon :)
 
Regards,
 
Sylvia
 
 
 
 
 
————————β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”———————β€€”β€”β€”β€”β€”————————β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”
 
Sylvia Cadena  |  APNIC Community Partnerships Specialist | sylvia@apnic.net
sylvia@voip.apnic.net | skypeID: sylviacadena
FB ISIF.asia | G+ ISIFAsia | @ISIF_Asia
 
6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD,  4101 Australia | PO Box 3646
Tel: +61 7 3858 3100 |  Fax: +61 7  3858 3199
http://www.apnic.net | http://www.isif.asia | https://blog.apnic.net/
* Love trees. Print only if necessary.
 
 
From: < dt-cwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org >
Date: Wednesday, 31 August 2016 at 5:44 AM
To: " dt-cwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" < dt-cwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org>
Subject: [Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] Proposed Agenda - new gTLD Auction Proceeds DT meeting on Wednesday 31 August at 19.30 UTC
 
Dear All,
 
Please find below the proposed agenda for the next new gTLD Auction Proceeds DT meeting which has been scheduled for Wednesday 31 August at 19.30 UTC.
 
Note, you will find attached two versions of the draft charter. One version includes all comments & edits made to date (note, in this version, some of Sylvia’s suggestions that were deemed non-controversial have already been incorporated) and one version in which all non-controversial comments and/or edits have been removed/accepted so that only those items that need DT input / review are remaining (note, most changes are still visible in redline). The items requiring DT review are highlighted in yellow in both versions. To facilitate the review and discussion during tomorrow’s meeting, the focus will be on the second version and more specifically the items highlighted in yellow. As such, if there are any other items that you believe need DT discussion, please flag those prior to the meeting.
 
Best regards,
 
Marika
 
Proposed Agenda – new gTLD Auction Proceeds DT Meeting – Wednesday 31 A1 August 2016
 
1.     Roll call / Welcome
2.     Review of latest version of draft charter (see attached):
a.     Any comments / concerns in relation to how remaining comments were addressed? (see latest version of public comment review tool)
b.     Any items that need to be discussed that have not been flagged as β€˜yellow’ (see attached for current β€˜yellow’ items)
c.      Review and discuss items flagged in yellow (see attached)
3.     Confirm deadline for final review & comments and target date for sharing draft charter with SO/ACs
4.     Confirm next meeting
 
Marika Konings
Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: marika.konings@icann.org  
 
Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages.
 

Content-Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document;
         name="CCWG Auction Proceeds - Draft Charter - items for discussion - Updated"
 30 August 2016 JR Edit.docx"
Content-Disposition: attachment;
         filename="CCWG Auction Proceeds - Draft Charter - items for discussion -"
 Updated 30 August 2016 JR Edit.docx"
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
         1;DM5PR03MB2714;9:d4HBoazr4NV3YOqd1GFzkkOSxIG+SDmc8LqRAz0AUy/ZzYQKo2JKrvqyBWZ1HYq7YZVeldohlv8lONmovffWo8JUGdzUHd490epu0WljoI8j6fgu0uEMurMx6SSQrpAdoQDIsBq97/95FOM4OS6my9L64CE8cNHjKops9HF08f59+AH9aTKZ15NBaaDRmmMcd5HsLxiU2kN5oKOsKoJGCg==

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
         1;DM5PR03MB2714;9:d4HBoazr4NV3YOqd1GFzkkOSxIG+SDmc8LqRAz0AUy/ZzYQKo2JKrvqyBWZ1HYq7YZVeldohlv8lONmovffWo8JUGdzUHd490epu0WljoI8j6fgu0uEMurMx6SSQrpAdoQDIsBq97/95FOM4OS6my9L64CE8cNHjKops9HF08f59+AH9aTKZ15NBaaDRmmMcd5HsLxiU2kN5oKOsKoJGCg==

_______________________________________________
Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/dt-cwg-auctionproceeds