- Epdp-dt - lists.icann.org

For your review - call for volunteers and statement of participation
by Marika Konings July 6, 2018

July 6, 2018

Dear All, You’ll find hereby for your review the draft call for volunteers which includes the proposed EPDP Statement of Participation: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WB8zOEiv1Vuqe2_JCEhsuWXRT49EGJGz7jqAI-z…. Please use the comment function to include any suggestions / edits you may have instead of redlining, including your name if you are not logged into Google. Note that this document may require further updating pending the outcome of the discussion on composition. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-…>.

1 0

URGENT: Please complete: Doodle poll: EPDP DT meeting week of the 9th July 2018
by Nathalie Peregrine July 6, 2018

July 6, 2018

Dear all, In order to schedule an EPDP DT meeting next week, please be so kind as to fill in the below Doodle poll. Please remember to provide as many slots as feasible in order to have a clear representation of who will be able to make the call. https://doodle.com/poll/yyhtg7zcxyfihqa3 [doodle.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__doodle.com_poll_yyhtg7…> Thank you! Nathalie Nathalie Peregrine Manager, Operations Support (GNSO) Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: nathalie.peregrine(a)icann.org <nathalie.peregrine(a)icann.org%20> Skype: nathalie.peregrine.icann Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<applewebdata://EB3A6F47-9760-400D-A39B-A7EFFC56B467/learn.icann.org/courses…> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gn…>

1 0

Please complete: Doodle poll: EPDP DT meeting week of the 9th July 2018
by Nathalie Peregrine July 5, 2018

July 5, 2018

Dear all, In order to schedule an EPDP DT meeting next week, please be so kind as to fill in the below Doodle poll. Please remember to provide as many slots as feasible in order to have a clear representation of who will be able to make the call. https://doodle.com/poll/yyhtg7zcxyfihqa3 Thank you! Nathalie Nathalie Peregrine Manager, Operations Support (GNSO) Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: nathalie.peregrine(a)icann.org <nathalie.peregrine(a)icann.org%20> Skype: nathalie.peregrine.icann Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<applewebdata://EB3A6F47-9760-400D-A39B-A7EFFC56B467/learn.icann.org/courses…> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gn…>

1 0

Re: [Epdp-dt] Deadline for input on charter topics - Friday 6 July COB
by Marika Konings July 5, 2018

July 5, 2018

As a reminder, please do not redline the current text in the charter which appears in the first section of the document, but instead, please provide your comments / proposed edits as part of the comments / suggestions section. Thank you, Marika From: Epdp-dt <epdp-dt-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org> Date: Thursday, July 5, 2018 at 16:15 To: "epdp-dt(a)icann.org" <epdp-dt(a)icann.org> Subject: [Epdp-dt] Deadline for input on charter topics - Friday 6 July COB Dear All, As discussed during the meeting, please review the links below and add any further input / comments you may have. Please do factor in today’s discussion and proposed approaches agreement on some of the topics. As noted, you are encouraged to focus on the comments/suggestions section instead of redline so that small team and staff are able to try and reconcile the different positions in updated proposed text. The deadline for providing input is Friday 6 July close of business (wherever you are). * Scope [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…> * Membership Criteria [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…> * EPDP Team [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…> * Key Metrics Considerations [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…> * Leadership [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…> * Recommended Working Methods and Resources [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…> * Problem/Issue Escalation & Resolution Processes [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…> * Decision-Making Methodologies [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…> * Deliverables and Timeframes [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…> To review the latest version of the charter (note, no further updates have been made since ICANN62): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1krM9egtdseUtXjEii2sth4syu97gNJZFqTIlvNM… [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…>. Thanks, Marika

1 0

Recordings, attendance & AC chat from the EPDP Initiation Request and Charter Drafting Team on Thursday 5 July 2018 at 12:00 UTC.
by Nathalie Peregrine July 5, 2018

July 5, 2018

Dear all, Please find the attendance and AC chat of the call attached to this email, and the MP3 and AC recording below for the EPDP Initiation Request and Charter Drafting Team on Thursday 5 July 2018 at 12:00 UTC. These have also been posted on the agenda wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/94NHBQ MP3: https://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-epdp-initiation-05jul18-en.mp3 AC Recording: https://participate.icann.org/p4tc4h71rta/ The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Mailing list archives: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/epdp-dt/ Main wiki page for the working group: https://community.icann.org/x/IYEpBQ Thank you. With kind regards, Nathalie

1 0

Notes and action items from today's DT meeting
by Marika Konings July 5, 2018

July 5, 2018

Dear All, Please find below the notes and action items from today’s meeting. The notice in relation to action item #3 will follow shortly after this email. Best regards, Marika Notes / Action items EPDP Drafting Team meeting on 5 July 2018: These high-level notes are designed to help the DT navigate through the content of the call and are not meant as a substitute for the transcript and/or recording. The MP3, transcript, and chat are provided separately and are posted on the wiki at https://community.icann.org/x/2wA5BQ. Scope * Note that a number of specific comments/edits were put forward to the current language in the charter, in addition to a number of general comments that were provided on the mailing list. * Recognition that EPDP needs to be focused in its initial phases just on the Temp Spec, nothing more. Objective is to have draft Initial Report ready by ICANN63 to have process completed by May 25 2019. * Work on access model is also urgent and important, but cannot be done in the 8-9 weeks available to work on the Temp Spec Initial Report. Work on Temp Spec would help inform discussion on access, includes a number of gating questions that need to be answered first. * Once Initial Report on Temp Spec is complete, then it should shift focus to access and accreditation, informed by the work on the Temp Spec. * BC does not agree that accreditation should be part of the EPDP - for the most part that will be handled outside of ICANN's remit. Access is key, BC understands that there is a short time available, but does not want to put a false deadline on for the work on access. Leave flexibility to EPDP Team and not limit the discussion of the EPDP based on perceived notion that the work cannot get done. * IPC is of the view that access remains in scope as it is part of the temporary specification. See also comments submitted to the mailing list. * Everything should be considered within scope of the EPDP, but items in the annex should be addressed following the completion of the Initial Report on the Temp Spec related issues. * Need to define the use of the term 'Temporary Specification' does it include or not include the Annex when referred to. For the purpose of the EPDP WG Phase One, "Temp Spec" does not include the Annex. The Annex can be considered in Phase Two following the publication of the Phase One initial report. * Consider forming a small group consisting of Paul, Susan, Keith and Stephanie to look at the different comments / positions and develop an approach that may be acceptable to all. Action item #1: DT members to review google doc (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1x2k9e3w752j-C_Ix43A7HSDV2G-_zXlyzZozei4…) and include any input / comments that are missing. Ideally focus should be on comments/suggestions section instead of redline so that small team is able to try and reconcile the different positions in an updated version. Action item #2: Paul, Susan, Keith and Stephanie (with support from staff as needed) to work on scope language. Action item #3: Staff to recirculate list of google docs with different charter topics so that DT members can review in next 24 hours that all info is there. Friday 6 July COB is deadline for any further input. Membership Criteria * See input received in google doc. * Is current language to prescriptive? Donna has suggested a less prescriptive replacement - noting that appointing organizations are responsible for selecting members that they believe are best suited for the role. * Consider sharing possible dates/location for F2F meetings to allow members to plan accordingly. Location may also depend on membership composition. * Fourth bullet - how to define temperament? consider changing it to willing to work in good faith towards consensus? Or solution oriented? Update to 'treat' and 'respect'. * If members do not abide by EPDP Team statement of participation, Chair has the ability to limit participation. * Use of the term consensus refers to section 3.6 of the GNSO Working Group guidelines, not Consensus Policy. Consider including a reference to the Working Group guidelines. Action item #4: Staff to replace dot points language in charter with text suggested by Donna (with minor edits as discussed) Action item #5: Staff to share proposed call for volunteers & EPDP Team statement of participation with DT for review. EPDP Team Composition * See comments in the google doc. * Principle of inclusivity key. * Board has confirmed Board's preference for 2 Board liaisons. * Parity between CSG and NCSG participation is sought. * Possible compromise put forward by BC (2+1 per C in CSG and 6 +3 for NCSG) * SO/AC representation: consider going back to 1 + 1, with the exception of the GAC who would get 3 + 3. SO/ACs would be invited to participate but not required to do so. Could consider inviting to appoint member or liaison - as their preference is. Liaisons primary's purpose is to get information back to group - liaisons can listen or work, while members have to commit to work and sign up to the statement of participation. Key is to ensure that a member/liaison from another SO/AC can't block consensus because they can't reach consensus within their own group. Should making consensus be the perogative of GNSO groups only? ACs have their means to provide Advice to the Board. To the extent that you are not able to agree to the statement in full, other SO/ACs should assign a liaison instead of a member. * May need to explain what a consensus call is. Reference GNSO WG Guidelines on provisions concerning consensus call. * Need to define member/liaison/observer/alternate terms. * Consider using a form that is to be used if/when alternates step in. * Small team identified for scope discussion also aim to finalize number discussion. Action item #6: Follow up with GAC on the difference between members and liaisons and their expectations with regards to GAC participation. Action item #7: Small team to review membership # and aim to come to agreement on proposal to take back to full DT. Deadline - provide proposal by Wednesday 11 July at the latest. Leadership: * Current suggestion in charter is for EPDP Team to appoint two vice-chairs, some may have concerns about that suggestion. Small leadership team may be preferred - one vice-chair may be sufficient. * Consider removing issue to appointing two vice-chairs but leave it to the EPDP Team to decide? * Point iii) please delete "and trademark law". Not all agree with the deletion of this reference as knowledge in that regard may be of specific importance in relation to access. Action item #8: DT to provide input on leadership section so that any issues can be resolved as soon as possible. Other topics: Action item #9: Staff to review comments / edits on other topics and see if/how these can be addressed in the master document. Next Steps: * No email vote yet as discussions have not completed yet. Likely vote to take place during Council meeting on 19 July. Aim is to have ‘final’ charter to the DT by next week Wednesday. Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-…>.

1 0

Edits to the charter
by Susan Kawaguchi July 5, 2018

July 5, 2018

Hello Marika, The BC has agreed upon adding the following to the draft charter. Add highlighted text to section j of charter Draft: j) Disclosure of non-public data to outside parties, including definition of terms in the Temp Spec, such as “reasonable access” j1) Should existing requirements in Temporary Specification remain in place until a Uniform Access Model is finalized? The BC requests that the Temp Spec Annex is added back into the EPDP charter and work on access be in parallel with all other work. Also include the following language concerning access to the scope of the ePDP charter. EPDP scope already includes developing policy for access, and for RDAP to replace Port 43. This scope should include policy development for tiered access via RDAP+, which could accept an accreditation token and purpose for query. This would allow legally-accredited entities to access non-public Whois if and when such accreditation is accomplished. The design of accreditation processes and legal clearance for those accreditation models would occur entirely *outside* of this EPDP. If and when an Accreditation model is cleared by appropriate legal authorities, RDAP+ should be ready to accept, log, and respond to these accredited access queries. The BC requests that we refer to a uniform access model as a generic term and does not refer to the ICANN org model Uniform Access Model. Best regards, Susan Kawaguchi Councilor for the Business Constituency

4 6

Reminder: EPDP Charter Templates for providing additional feedback
by Nathalie Peregrine July 5, 2018

July 5, 2018

Dear Drafting Team Members, Thank you for all of your work at ICANN62. In an effort to catalogue feedback in one place and avoid version control issues, ICANN Staff has created Google Doc templates that you may use to continue to provide feedback on the draft charter. Each template provides: * The current text in the charter * A section for comments/concerns/feedback * Proposed compromise text (if any) The templates are divided by category so that you will be able to zero in on the categories you would like to provide additional feedback on. Additionally, multiple templates prevent one template from becoming too long and unwieldy. We have done our best to input the comments received via the list so far, but please feel free to comment on the text if your feedback was inadvertently omitted. If you would like to provide additional feedback, please be sure to put your name next to the feedback so it is clear who is making the suggestion(s). Here are the links to the templates: * Scope<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1x2k9e3w752j-C_Ix43A7HSDV2G-_zXlyzZozei4…> * Membership Criteria<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qjvx_fQJgfJnIx5EUV7cW4PbRA_qTE0Njp7tHPs…> * EPDP Team<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1I3LJkIN1Xdp8lW92fLq5d_bLgFv7gWQvOb9mgVS…> * Key Metrics Considerations<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bFfgCRKYz0iXnVrP7-oD0jqsmgsmOXyhhD62BwM…> * Leadership<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dp8PEa4Y2_ezAMc-HKR0nMchcFvDGkPbs5XLBsi…> * Recommended Working Methods and Resources<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rWqSqp0JDSx96Q6RWfQJUuh_aYfgzNJ2hS055gC…> * Problem/Issue Escalation & Resolution Processes<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vYQAg35xYqB1SjYlu4NxNr9NQ6QSi8v9xnlzq3O…> * Decision-Making Methodologies<https://docs.google.com/document/d/128eGEVR8WCUmviCWEiXVHu1EK8-J398p5JVn9AB…> * Problem/Issue Escalation & Resolution Processes<https://docs.google.com/document/d/128eGEVR8WCUmviCWEiXVHu1EK8-J398p5JVn9AB…> If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know. Kind regards, and safe travels, Caitlin Caitlin Tubergen Policy Senior Manager - GNSO ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 Office: +1 310 578 8666 Mobile: +1 310 699 5326 Email: caitlin.tubergen(a)icann.org<mailto:caitlin.tubergen@icann.org>

1 0

Membership Composition - All Stakeholder Groups Must Have Parity in Numbers
by Ayden Férdeline July 5, 2018

July 5, 2018

Dear all, I hope that I am mis-reading the table in [this section of the charter](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1I3LJkIN1Xdp8lW92fLq5d_bLgFv7gW…. From what I see, it has been proposed that the Commercial Stakeholder Group will have 9 members on the EPDP, whereas all other Stakeholder Groups will have 3 members. This is fundamentally unfair and we require parity. If this is not an error, I would like to know based on what rationale it was thought to allocate 9 membership slots to the CSG while all other Stakeholder Groups have only 3 members. At the NCPH level, it is essential that there be parity in membership numbers between the CSG and the NCSG. Thank you, Ayden Férdeline

9 20

FW: IPC Proposed amendments to the Draft ePDP Charter
by McGrady, Paul D. July 5, 2018

July 5, 2018

All, I am told that the attached which I sent in on Monday have not made it into the current version of the draft Charter. I left Panama under the impression we were to send these to Staff but instead it turns out we were supposed to be adding these ourselves to various portions at various links. I am doing my best to deposit these into those various documents ASAP (in the 7 minutes before the call) but the attached, at least, shows what the comments will be. Apologies to you and to the Staff for the inconvenience. Best, Paul Paul D. McGrady Partner Winston & Strawn LLP 35 W. Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60601-9703 D: +1 312-558-5963 F: +1 312-558-5700 Bio<http://www.winston.com/en/who-we-are/attorneys/mcgrady-paul-d.html> | VCard<http://www.winston.com/vcards/996.vcf> | Email<mailto:pmcgrady@winston.com> | winston.com<http://www.winston.com> [Winston & Strawn LLP] From: McGrady, Paul D. Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2018 6:41 AM To: 'Nathalie Peregrine' <nathalie.peregrine(a)icann.org>; 'Marika Konings' <marika.konings(a)icann.org> Cc: 'Heather Forrest' <haforrestesq(a)gmail.com> Subject: FW: IPC Proposed amendments to the Draft ePDP Charter Hi Nathalie & Marika, In preparing for today's call I noticed that I did not copy Marika on my email below to Nathalie. Hopefully, the IPC proposed changes to the draft Charter made their way into the latest version of the draft Charter anyway (I can't find the link to the latest version). Apologies for the inconvenience. Best, Paul From: McGrady, Paul D. Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 5:18 PM To: 'Nathalie Peregrine' <nathalie.peregrine(a)icann.org<mailto:nathalie.peregrine@icann.org>> Cc: 'Heather Forrest' <haforrestesq(a)gmail.com<mailto:haforrestesq@gmail.com>> Subject: IPC Proposed amendments to the Draft ePDP Charter Hi Nathalie, Attached is a redline of the Charter that constitute the IPC's proposed amendments to the Draft Charter. The IPC, of course, reserves the right to suggest additional edits as this process unfolds. Best, Paul Paul D. McGrady Partner Winston & Strawn LLP 35 W. Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60601-9703 D: +1 312-558-5963 F: +1 312-558-5700 Bio<http://www.winston.com/en/who-we-are/attorneys/mcgrady-paul-d.html> | VCard<http://www.winston.com/vcards/996.vcf> | Email<mailto:pmcgrady@winston.com> | winston.com<http://www.winston.com> [Winston & Strawn LLP] ________________________________ The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. If this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author. Any tax advice contained in this email was not intended to be used, and cannot be used, by you (or any other taxpayer) to avoid penalties under applicable tax laws and regulations.

1 0