Some comments:EPDP1 - 2B - It seems that an added question of whether the thin to thick transition should continue or be reversed is in order, otherwise the only thick registries in a few years could be the currently thin ones
EPDP1 - 2H - Not all EBERO transitions are done without registry data. It's foreseen that using zone files plus data escrow is a last resort, but the first attempt would be to use data from the failing registry.
EPDP2 - D - While the rules/policies to access data already encompasses what I will mention, I noticed that some misunderstanding in the community came out of assuming that accredited parties will have unlimited "all you can eat" access. I don't think the scope matrix even suggests that to be the case, but perhaps detailing this as question could help building bridges in the community and allow for a more collegial discussion of how it will work.
Rubens
Dear All,
On behalf of Keith, please find attached the scope matrix that was referenced during the discussions yesterday.
Best regards,
Marika
Marika Konings
Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO