I certainly agree that nobody should have code "foisted upon them".  That said, one significant impediment to UA can be a simple inability (or lack of resources) to create the necessary code.  Sometimes that will, as noted, result in bad/unreliable code.  Sometimes, it will result in no code at all -- not from unwillingness to implement UA, but from simple inability. 

The obvious solution would be for ICANN to make available basic UA modules.  We couldn't cover every coding language, of course.  But we could hit the major ones.  If we don't have the necessary expertise in house, rent-a-coders are dirt cheap. 

Bill Jouris 

Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer

On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 11:42 AM, Jonathan Zuck via At-Large
<at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org> wrote:
_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large

At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.