Especially as this could always be extended if that were required...

On 04/04/07, Vittorio Bertola <vb@bertola.eu> wrote:
All,

I see that the discussion is again getting polarized - with people
stacking on the two extreme options.

Would the middle ground of April 22 be acceptable to everyone? So that
we can close the discussion and start discussing nominations.

The only other option is to stick to the process agreed in Lisbon, which
is the default if we can't agree to change it. But I really think that
if we all are reasonable, then we can find a compromise that is good for
everyone.

So, does anyone really object to April 22?

Thanks,
--
vb.                   Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu   <--------
-------->  finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/  <--------

_______________________________________________
EURO-Discuss mailing list
EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org



--
--
Regards,

Nick Ashton-Hart
PO Box 32160
London N4 2XY
United Kingdom
UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011
USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460
Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135
mobile: +44 (7774) 932798
Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart
Online Bio:   https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart