Fwd: ICANN News Alert -- Launch of the Implementation Advisory Group to Review Existing ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law
Dear all, congratulations to EURALO ALS reps Christopher Wilkinson (ISOC Wallonie) and Jordi Iparraguirre (ISOC Catalonia) for being part of this advisory group. Best regards, Olivier -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: ICANN News Alert -- Launch of the Implementation Advisory Group to Review Existing ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 18:43:20 -0500 From: ICANN News Alert <communications@icann.org> Reply-To: communications@icann.org To: ocl@gih.com ICANN News Alert ICANN <http://www.icann.org/> News Alert https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-12-12-en ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Launch of the Implementation Advisory Group to Review Existing ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law 12 December 2014 We are pleased to announce the launch of the Implementation Advisory Group to Review the Existing ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law (IAG-WHOIS Conflicts). Sixty-one (61) individuals responded to the Call for Volunteers <http://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-10-14-en>. IAG-WHOIS Conflicts is an open group convened to serve for a limited duration and scope, focusing exclusively on evaluating the ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law <http://www.icann.org/resources/pages/whois-privacy-conflicts-procedure-2008-...> and providing recommendations on possible changes to the Procedure to the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO.) We welcome the following volunteers as members of the newly convened IAG-WHOIS Conflicts: Tamer Abdallah Aboyazan Aboyazan Abdullahi Adhi Gewana Mona Al Achkar Jabbour Alyn Andrade Mark Bayliss Hela Ben Nejima Don M. Blumenthal Gary Campbell Patrick Charnley Adrian Cheek Donna Cunningham Christian Dawson Shady El Shafei Lars-Erik Forsberg Marianne Georgelin Allan Ghazi Ashley Heineman Raymond Ho Ismail Hummad Jordi Iparraguirre Lazkani Khaled Tarun Krishnakumar Taufik Kurniawan Yuan Lu Abd Mahmod Camino Manjon Steven J. Metalitz Abdou Mfopa Don Moody Manuel Moreno-Torres Mohamed Mosaad Basma Nazif Michele Neylon Mbabazi Norman Drew Noyes Ghislain Nyamfit Ng. Seun Ojedeji Chris Pelling Jonathan Perez Stephanie Perrin Elvin Prasad Adrián Quesada Rodríguez Mohamed Quriba Merit Ramses Kamal Adamantia Rachovitsa Tariq Rashid Seth M. Reiss Mohammed Rezkovic Carlton Samuels D. Saravanan Luc Seufer Emily Taylor Bennette Thomas John WD Thomson Mbungyuh Tseyah James Daniel Vidal Christopher Wilkinson Ali Yesdel Ibrahim To track the work of this group, please visit the IAG-WHOIS Conflicts Wiki <https://community.icann.org/display/WNLCI/WHOIS+and+national+law+conflicts+I...>. IAG-WHOIS Conflicts Schedule and Operations The IAG-WHOIS Conflicts is expected to commence its work in January 2015 and produce its recommendations by June 2015. A kick-off conference call will be scheduled for 7 January. A schedule of subsequent calls and meetings will be available on the IAG-WHOIS Conflicts Wiki <https://community.icann.org/display/WNLCI/IAG-WHOIS+and+Conflicts+Conference...>. IAG-WHOIS Conflicts Mission and Scope The IAG-WHOIS Conflicts is tasked with providing the GNSO Council suggestions on how to improve the current Procedure. The The IAG's mission and scope will focus on changes to the Procedure and not ICANN's contractual requirements. Any recommendations made by the IAG will be forwarded to the GNSO Council to determine whether implementation of the Procedure ought to be changed. As part of its deliberations, the IAG should, at a minimum, consider the following issues that were highlighted in the recent Report of Public Comments on this topic. Those issues include: * Process: Should the Procedure be revised to allow for invocation prior to contracting? o If adopted, how would that alter the contracting process? o What parties would be most appropriate to include at this early stage of the Procedure? * Trigger: What triggers would be appropriate for invoking the Procedure? o Would evidence from a data protection authority that the contract is in conflict with national laws be sufficient to trigger the Procedure? If so, how would ICANN define which data protection authority is an acceptable authority? Would the authority have to be a nationally representative body? Should a regional body's opinion carry the same weight as a national or local authority? o Similarly, would an official opinion from a government agency provide enough evidence? If so, which agencies would be most appropriate? Would it have to be an agency tasked with data protection? What about a consumer trust bureau or treasury department that includes consumer protections in its mandate? Or would a foreign ministry provide the best source of information? Which bodies would be considered authoritative enough to provide a creditable opinion? o Would evidence of a conflict from ICANN-provided analysis provide sufficient information to invoke the Procedure? What type of evidence should this analysis cite? o If the Procedure allowed for a written opinion from a nationally recognized law firm to provide sufficient evidence for a trigger? What types of firms could be considered nationally recognized? Should it be accredited or made to prove its competency? If so, how? What if ICANN receives contradictory opinions from two firms? How is it to determine the more valid argument? * Public comment: How should public comments be incorporated into the Procedure? o What role should comments have in ICANN's decision-making process? o What length of public comment period is appropriate to ensure that the Procedure is completed in a timely fashion? o How should comments be analyzed? o Should public comments be treated as a safeguard in case a decision is flawed? The IAG shall invite participation in its discussions from other ICANN Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees, including the GAC. Background ICANN announced a Call for Volunteers for the Implementation Advisory Group to Review Existing ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Laws <http://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-10-14-en>on 14 October 2014. The call for volunteers followed a paper published 22 May 2014 <http://www.icann.org/public-comments/whois-conflicts-procedure-2014-05-22-en>, which opened a review process to solicit community feedback on the Procedure's effectiveness. Based on the comments received in response to the paper, ICANN convened this IAG in order to explore suggested changes to the Procedure, which would be forwarded to the GNSO Council for its consideration. Staff contact Please contact Eleeza Agopian at eleeza.agopian@icann.org <mailto:eleeza.agopian@icann.org> with any questions. This message was sent to ocl@gih.com from: ICANN News Alert | communications@icann.org | ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Email Marketing by iContact - Try It Free! <http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186> Manage Your Subscription <http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=9829257&l=6333&s=YVM2&m=9545...>
Wow! 'Flowers' - (and we haven't started yet … ) That's a First. Thankyou Olivier CW On 13 Dec 2014, at 13:33, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> wrote:
Dear all,
congratulations to EURALO ALS reps Christopher Wilkinson (ISOC Wallonie) and Jordi Iparraguirre (ISOC Catalonia) for being part of this advisory group. Best regards,
Olivier
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: ICANN News Alert -- Launch of the Implementation Advisory Group to Review Existing ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 18:43:20 -0500 From: ICANN News Alert <communications@icann.org> Reply-To: communications@icann.org To: ocl@gih.com
ICANN News Alert ICANN <http://www.icann.org/>
News Alert
https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-12-12-en
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Launch of the Implementation Advisory Group to Review Existing ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law
12 December 2014
We are pleased to announce the launch of the Implementation Advisory Group to Review the Existing ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law (IAG-WHOIS Conflicts). Sixty-one (61) individuals responded to the Call for Volunteers <http://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-10-14-en>. IAG-WHOIS Conflicts is an open group convened to serve for a limited duration and scope, focusing exclusively on evaluating the ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law <http://www.icann.org/resources/pages/whois-privacy-conflicts-procedure-2008-...> and providing recommendations on possible changes to the Procedure to the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO.)
We welcome the following volunteers as members of the newly convened IAG-WHOIS Conflicts:
Tamer Abdallah Aboyazan Aboyazan Abdullahi Adhi Gewana Mona Al Achkar Jabbour Alyn Andrade Mark Bayliss Hela Ben Nejima Don M. Blumenthal Gary Campbell Patrick Charnley Adrian Cheek Donna Cunningham Christian Dawson Shady El Shafei Lars-Erik Forsberg Marianne Georgelin Allan Ghazi Ashley Heineman Raymond Ho Ismail Hummad Jordi Iparraguirre Lazkani Khaled Tarun Krishnakumar Taufik Kurniawan Yuan Lu Abd Mahmod Camino Manjon Steven J. Metalitz Abdou Mfopa Don Moody Manuel Moreno-Torres Mohamed Mosaad Basma Nazif Michele Neylon Mbabazi Norman Drew Noyes Ghislain Nyamfit Ng. Seun Ojedeji Chris Pelling Jonathan Perez Stephanie Perrin Elvin Prasad Adrián Quesada Rodríguez Mohamed Quriba Merit Ramses Kamal Adamantia Rachovitsa Tariq Rashid Seth M. Reiss Mohammed Rezkovic Carlton Samuels D. Saravanan Luc Seufer Emily Taylor Bennette Thomas John WD Thomson Mbungyuh Tseyah James Daniel Vidal Christopher Wilkinson Ali Yesdel Ibrahim
To track the work of this group, please visit the IAG-WHOIS Conflicts Wiki <https://community.icann.org/display/WNLCI/WHOIS+and+national+law+conflicts+I...>.
IAG-WHOIS Conflicts Schedule and Operations
The IAG-WHOIS Conflicts is expected to commence its work in January 2015 and produce its recommendations by June 2015.
A kick-off conference call will be scheduled for 7 January.
A schedule of subsequent calls and meetings will be available on the IAG-WHOIS Conflicts Wiki <https://community.icann.org/display/WNLCI/IAG-WHOIS+and+Conflicts+Conference...>.
IAG-WHOIS Conflicts Mission and Scope
The IAG-WHOIS Conflicts is tasked with providing the GNSO Council suggestions on how to improve the current Procedure. The The IAG's mission and scope will focus on changes to the Procedure and not ICANN's contractual requirements. Any recommendations made by the IAG will be forwarded to the GNSO Council to determine whether implementation of the Procedure ought to be changed.
As part of its deliberations, the IAG should, at a minimum, consider the following issues that were highlighted in the recent Report of Public Comments on this topic. Those issues include:
* Process: Should the Procedure be revised to allow for invocation prior to contracting? o If adopted, how would that alter the contracting process? o What parties would be most appropriate to include at this early stage of the Procedure? * Trigger: What triggers would be appropriate for invoking the Procedure? o Would evidence from a data protection authority that the contract is in conflict with national laws be sufficient to trigger the Procedure? If so, how would ICANN define which data protection authority is an acceptable authority? Would the authority have to be a nationally representative body? Should a regional body's opinion carry the same weight as a national or local authority? o Similarly, would an official opinion from a government agency provide enough evidence? If so, which agencies would be most appropriate? Would it have to be an agency tasked with data protection? What about a consumer trust bureau or treasury department that includes consumer protections in its mandate? Or would a foreign ministry provide the best source of information? Which bodies would be considered authoritative enough to provide a creditable opinion? o Would evidence of a conflict from ICANN-provided analysis provide sufficient information to invoke the Procedure? What type of evidence should this analysis cite? o If the Procedure allowed for a written opinion from a nationally recognized law firm to provide sufficient evidence for a trigger? What types of firms could be considered nationally recognized? Should it be accredited or made to prove its competency? If so, how? What if ICANN receives contradictory opinions from two firms? How is it to determine the more valid argument? * Public comment: How should public comments be incorporated into the Procedure? o What role should comments have in ICANN's decision-making process? o What length of public comment period is appropriate to ensure that the Procedure is completed in a timely fashion? o How should comments be analyzed? o Should public comments be treated as a safeguard in case a decision is flawed?
The IAG shall invite participation in its discussions from other ICANN Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees, including the GAC.
Background
ICANN announced a Call for Volunteers for the Implementation Advisory Group to Review Existing ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Laws <http://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-10-14-en>on 14 October 2014. The call for volunteers followed a paper published 22 May 2014 <http://www.icann.org/public-comments/whois-conflicts-procedure-2014-05-22-en>, which opened a review process to solicit community feedback on the Procedure's effectiveness. Based on the comments received in response to the paper, ICANN convened this IAG in order to explore suggested changes to the Procedure, which would be forwarded to the GNSO Council for its consideration.
Staff contact
Please contact Eleeza Agopian at eleeza.agopian@icann.org <mailto:eleeza.agopian@icann.org> with any questions.
This message was sent to ocl@gih.com from:
ICANN News Alert | communications@icann.org | ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
Email Marketing by iContact - Try It Free! <http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186>
Manage Your Subscription <http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=9829257&l=6333&s=YVM2&m=9545...>
_______________________________________________ EURO-Discuss mailing list EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss
Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org
Dear Christopher, this topic is a particularly hot topic for EURALO so I am glad some volunteers from our community stepped forward. I hope it will inspire others - you CAN make a difference. Kind regards, Olivier On 13/12/2014 13:28, Christopher Wilkinson wrote:
Wow! 'Flowers' - (and we haven't started yet … )
That's a First. Thankyou Olivier
CW
On 13 Dec 2014, at 13:33, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> wrote:
Dear all,
congratulations to EURALO ALS reps Christopher Wilkinson (ISOC Wallonie) and Jordi Iparraguirre (ISOC Catalonia) for being part of this advisory group. Best regards,
Olivier
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: ICANN News Alert -- Launch of the Implementation Advisory Group to Review Existing ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 18:43:20 -0500 From: ICANN News Alert <communications@icann.org> Reply-To: communications@icann.org To: ocl@gih.com
ICANN News Alert ICANN <http://www.icann.org/>
News Alert
https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-12-12-en
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Launch of the Implementation Advisory Group to Review Existing ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law
12 December 2014
We are pleased to announce the launch of the Implementation Advisory Group to Review the Existing ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law (IAG-WHOIS Conflicts). Sixty-one (61) individuals responded to the Call for Volunteers <http://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-10-14-en>. IAG-WHOIS Conflicts is an open group convened to serve for a limited duration and scope, focusing exclusively on evaluating the ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law <http://www.icann.org/resources/pages/whois-privacy-conflicts-procedure-2008-...> and providing recommendations on possible changes to the Procedure to the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO.)
We welcome the following volunteers as members of the newly convened IAG-WHOIS Conflicts:
Tamer Abdallah Aboyazan Aboyazan Abdullahi Adhi Gewana Mona Al Achkar Jabbour Alyn Andrade Mark Bayliss Hela Ben Nejima Don M. Blumenthal Gary Campbell Patrick Charnley Adrian Cheek Donna Cunningham Christian Dawson Shady El Shafei Lars-Erik Forsberg Marianne Georgelin Allan Ghazi Ashley Heineman Raymond Ho Ismail Hummad Jordi Iparraguirre Lazkani Khaled Tarun Krishnakumar Taufik Kurniawan Yuan Lu Abd Mahmod Camino Manjon Steven J. Metalitz Abdou Mfopa Don Moody Manuel Moreno-Torres Mohamed Mosaad Basma Nazif Michele Neylon Mbabazi Norman Drew Noyes Ghislain Nyamfit Ng. Seun Ojedeji Chris Pelling Jonathan Perez Stephanie Perrin Elvin Prasad Adrián Quesada Rodríguez Mohamed Quriba Merit Ramses Kamal Adamantia Rachovitsa Tariq Rashid Seth M. Reiss Mohammed Rezkovic Carlton Samuels D. Saravanan Luc Seufer Emily Taylor Bennette Thomas John WD Thomson Mbungyuh Tseyah James Daniel Vidal Christopher Wilkinson Ali Yesdel Ibrahim
To track the work of this group, please visit the IAG-WHOIS Conflicts Wiki <https://community.icann.org/display/WNLCI/WHOIS+and+national+law+conflicts+I...>.
IAG-WHOIS Conflicts Schedule and Operations
The IAG-WHOIS Conflicts is expected to commence its work in January 2015 and produce its recommendations by June 2015.
A kick-off conference call will be scheduled for 7 January.
A schedule of subsequent calls and meetings will be available on the IAG-WHOIS Conflicts Wiki <https://community.icann.org/display/WNLCI/IAG-WHOIS+and+Conflicts+Conference...>.
IAG-WHOIS Conflicts Mission and Scope
The IAG-WHOIS Conflicts is tasked with providing the GNSO Council suggestions on how to improve the current Procedure. The The IAG's mission and scope will focus on changes to the Procedure and not ICANN's contractual requirements. Any recommendations made by the IAG will be forwarded to the GNSO Council to determine whether implementation of the Procedure ought to be changed.
As part of its deliberations, the IAG should, at a minimum, consider the following issues that were highlighted in the recent Report of Public Comments on this topic. Those issues include:
* Process: Should the Procedure be revised to allow for invocation prior to contracting? o If adopted, how would that alter the contracting process? o What parties would be most appropriate to include at this early stage of the Procedure? * Trigger: What triggers would be appropriate for invoking the Procedure? o Would evidence from a data protection authority that the contract is in conflict with national laws be sufficient to trigger the Procedure? If so, how would ICANN define which data protection authority is an acceptable authority? Would the authority have to be a nationally representative body? Should a regional body's opinion carry the same weight as a national or local authority? o Similarly, would an official opinion from a government agency provide enough evidence? If so, which agencies would be most appropriate? Would it have to be an agency tasked with data protection? What about a consumer trust bureau or treasury department that includes consumer protections in its mandate? Or would a foreign ministry provide the best source of information? Which bodies would be considered authoritative enough to provide a creditable opinion? o Would evidence of a conflict from ICANN-provided analysis provide sufficient information to invoke the Procedure? What type of evidence should this analysis cite? o If the Procedure allowed for a written opinion from a nationally recognized law firm to provide sufficient evidence for a trigger? What types of firms could be considered nationally recognized? Should it be accredited or made to prove its competency? If so, how? What if ICANN receives contradictory opinions from two firms? How is it to determine the more valid argument? * Public comment: How should public comments be incorporated into the Procedure? o What role should comments have in ICANN's decision-making process? o What length of public comment period is appropriate to ensure that the Procedure is completed in a timely fashion? o How should comments be analyzed? o Should public comments be treated as a safeguard in case a decision is flawed?
The IAG shall invite participation in its discussions from other ICANN Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees, including the GAC.
Background
ICANN announced a Call for Volunteers for the Implementation Advisory Group to Review Existing ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Laws <http://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-10-14-en>on 14 October 2014. The call for volunteers followed a paper published 22 May 2014 <http://www.icann.org/public-comments/whois-conflicts-procedure-2014-05-22-en>, which opened a review process to solicit community feedback on the Procedure's effectiveness. Based on the comments received in response to the paper, ICANN convened this IAG in order to explore suggested changes to the Procedure, which would be forwarded to the GNSO Council for its consideration.
Staff contact
Please contact Eleeza Agopian at eleeza.agopian@icann.org <mailto:eleeza.agopian@icann.org> with any questions.
This message was sent to ocl@gih.com from:
ICANN News Alert | communications@icann.org | ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
Email Marketing by iContact - Try It Free! <http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186>
Manage Your Subscription <http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=9829257&l=6333&s=YVM2&m=9545...>
_______________________________________________ EURO-Discuss mailing list EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss
Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org
-- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
Besides Michele Neylon who is a member of EURALO's Individuals Association ;-) Best, Wolf Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote Sat, 13 Dec 2014 12:33:
Dear all,
congratulations to EURALO ALS reps Christopher Wilkinson (ISOC Wallonie) and Jordi Iparraguirre (ISOC Catalonia) for being part of this advisory group. Best regards,
Olivier
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: ICANN News Alert -- Launch of the Implementation Advisory Group to Review Existing ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 18:43:20 -0500 From: ICANN News Alert <communications@icann.org> Reply-To: communications@icann.org To: ocl@gih.com
ICANN News Alert ICANN <http://www.icann.org/>
News Alert
https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-12-12-en
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Launch of the Implementation Advisory Group to Review Existing ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law
12 December 2014
We are pleased to announce the launch of the Implementation Advisory Group to Review the Existing ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law (IAG-WHOIS Conflicts). Sixty-one (61) individuals responded to the Call for Volunteers <http://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-10-14-en>. IAG-WHOIS Conflicts is an open group convened to serve for a limited duration and scope, focusing exclusively on evaluating the ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law <http://www.icann.org/resources/pages/whois-privacy-conflicts-procedure-2008-...> and providing recommendations on possible changes to the Procedure to the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO.)
We welcome the following volunteers as members of the newly convened IAG-WHOIS Conflicts:
Tamer Abdallah Aboyazan Aboyazan Abdullahi Adhi Gewana Mona Al Achkar Jabbour Alyn Andrade Mark Bayliss Hela Ben Nejima Don M. Blumenthal Gary Campbell Patrick Charnley Adrian Cheek Donna Cunningham Christian Dawson Shady El Shafei Lars-Erik Forsberg Marianne Georgelin Allan Ghazi Ashley Heineman Raymond Ho Ismail Hummad Jordi Iparraguirre Lazkani Khaled Tarun Krishnakumar Taufik Kurniawan Yuan Lu Abd Mahmod Camino Manjon Steven J. Metalitz Abdou Mfopa Don Moody Manuel Moreno-Torres Mohamed Mosaad Basma Nazif Michele Neylon Mbabazi Norman Drew Noyes Ghislain Nyamfit Ng. Seun Ojedeji Chris Pelling Jonathan Perez Stephanie Perrin Elvin Prasad Adrián Quesada Rodríguez Mohamed Quriba Merit Ramses Kamal Adamantia Rachovitsa Tariq Rashid Seth M. Reiss Mohammed Rezkovic Carlton Samuels D. Saravanan Luc Seufer Emily Taylor Bennette Thomas John WD Thomson Mbungyuh Tseyah James Daniel Vidal Christopher Wilkinson Ali Yesdel Ibrahim
To track the work of this group, please visit the IAG-WHOIS Conflicts Wiki <https://community.icann.org/display/WNLCI/WHOIS+and+national+law+conflicts+I...>.
IAG-WHOIS Conflicts Schedule and Operations
The IAG-WHOIS Conflicts is expected to commence its work in January 2015 and produce its recommendations by June 2015.
A kick-off conference call will be scheduled for 7 January.
A schedule of subsequent calls and meetings will be available on the IAG-WHOIS Conflicts Wiki <https://community.icann.org/display/WNLCI/IAG-WHOIS+and+Conflicts+Conference...>.
IAG-WHOIS Conflicts Mission and Scope
The IAG-WHOIS Conflicts is tasked with providing the GNSO Council suggestions on how to improve the current Procedure. The The IAG's mission and scope will focus on changes to the Procedure and not ICANN's contractual requirements. Any recommendations made by the IAG will be forwarded to the GNSO Council to determine whether implementation of the Procedure ought to be changed.
As part of its deliberations, the IAG should, at a minimum, consider the following issues that were highlighted in the recent Report of Public Comments on this topic. Those issues include:
* Process: Should the Procedure be revised to allow for invocation prior to contracting? o If adopted, how would that alter the contracting process? o What parties would be most appropriate to include at this early stage of the Procedure? * Trigger: What triggers would be appropriate for invoking the Procedure? o Would evidence from a data protection authority that the contract is in conflict with national laws be sufficient to trigger the Procedure? If so, how would ICANN define which data protection authority is an acceptable authority? Would the authority have to be a nationally representative body? Should a regional body's opinion carry the same weight as a national or local authority? o Similarly, would an official opinion from a government agency provide enough evidence? If so, which agencies would be most appropriate? Would it have to be an agency tasked with data protection? What about a consumer trust bureau or treasury department that includes consumer protections in its mandate? Or would a foreign ministry provide the best source of information? Which bodies would be considered authoritative enough to provide a creditable opinion? o Would evidence of a conflict from ICANN-provided analysis provide sufficient information to invoke the Procedure? What type of evidence should this analysis cite? o If the Procedure allowed for a written opinion from a nationally recognized law firm to provide sufficient evidence for a trigger? What types of firms could be considered nationally recognized? Should it be accredited or made to prove its competency? If so, how? What if ICANN receives contradictory opinions from two firms? How is it to determine the more valid argument? * Public comment: How should public comments be incorporated into the Procedure? o What role should comments have in ICANN's decision-making process? o What length of public comment period is appropriate to ensure that the Procedure is completed in a timely fashion? o How should comments be analyzed? o Should public comments be treated as a safeguard in case a decision is flawed?
The IAG shall invite participation in its discussions from other ICANN Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees, including the GAC.
Background
ICANN announced a Call for Volunteers for the Implementation Advisory Group to Review Existing ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Laws <http://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-10-14-en>on 14 October 2014. The call for volunteers followed a paper published 22 May 2014 <http://www.icann.org/public-comments/whois-conflicts-procedure-2014-05-22-en>, which opened a review process to solicit community feedback on the Procedure's effectiveness. Based on the comments received in response to the paper, ICANN convened this IAG in order to explore suggested changes to the Procedure, which would be forwarded to the GNSO Council for its consideration.
Staff contact
Please contact Eleeza Agopian at eleeza.agopian@icann.org <mailto:eleeza.agopian@icann.org> with any questions.
This message was sent to ocl@gih.com from:
ICANN News Alert | communications@icann.org | ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
Email Marketing by iContact - Try It Free! <http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186>
Manage Your Subscription <http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=9829257&l=6333&s=YVM2&m=9545...>
_______________________________________________ EURO-Discuss mailing list EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss
Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org
EuroDIG Secretariat http://www.eurodig.org/ mobile +41 79 204 83 87 Skype: Wolf-Ludwig EURALO - ICANN's Regional At-Large Organisation http://euralo.org Profile on LinkedIn http://ch.linkedin.com/in/wolfludwig
participants (3)
-
Christopher Wilkinson -
Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond -
Wolf Ludwig