Dear All! Greetings from Moldova! Let me quickly share my comments vis-a-vis the whole process and my involvement in it. First of all, I have been following all the discussions with great attention, and I would just want to reply to the questions raised here, within the group, related to my presence and my candidature . 1) No, I am not shy at all:), it is that I could not raise up my voice more than introducing myself, because the discussions focused more on procedural aspects rather than on conceptual matters. And I am just so new to the list, and not in the position to express myself vis-a-vis the aspects/rules/procedures that are already in place and that should be respected. But I would be more than happy to provide any views on conceptual ICANN/Internet users/gTLDs/IG, etc. related matters/issues. 2) Yes, I am very confident in using English: it is part of my every day life. 3) I perfectly understand that it is hard to make a decision when it comes to a person we don't know: I would have had the same doubts/I would have needed more information, details, facts, etc/ - and this is a normal phenomena - it's part our human nature! Still, I want to thank very much both Annette and Wolfgang for their recommendation and for proposing my candidature. During the 2 ALAC outreach meetings I attended (Prague and Athens last year) I have shared with both of them my interest in helping getting internet end users - especially of developing countries - involved in ICANN decision making processes, in strengthening civil society in Eastern Europe and considering civil liberties in setting up IT-infrastructure, promoting multilingualism and cultural diversity on the Internet and support competition in Domain market. And there are several facts that can help me accomplish all these: good reputation in Moldova among various stakeholders (International Community, Diplomatic Community, Ministry of Education, National NGOs, LPA, etc.) as the NGO I run has been implementing a series of social projects in Moldova; a 3 years of good collaboration with DiploFoundation, Malta; and now, the most recent experience of the NGO I run ("CMB" Training Center) is being member of the Global Knowledge Partnership - since July 2006. In this context, I would just want to share an example of the program I will coordinate starting with end of May: "Young Leaders for Community Development through Internet Governance", supported by GKP. 4) In spite of all these, I think that the other current candidates are much more qualified and have much more experience in the field and I am sure that the final decision would be based on these important aspects. I thank you all very much for your time and I am sorry for causing/provoking so many procedural type discussions! Good luck everyone, Veronica
Veronica Cretu wrote:
And I am just so new to the list, and not in the position to express myself vis-à-vis the aspects/rules/procedures that are already in place and that should be respected.
Dear Veronica, I am glad to hear from you. I am also glad to see you agree that rules in place should be respected. I am relieved that, thanks to you, we finally reach a consensus on the procedural aspects.
I thank you all very much for your time and I am sorry for causing/provoking so many procedural type discussions!
You do not need to be sorry. Obviously, the upcoming board will need to suggest clarifications to the bylaws and/or MoU to address the grey areas in the texts. These are teething problems, as is the case in any new organization. Please understand my comments over those last days were not a personal attack against you, and I do apologize if they might have hurted you. I am convinced you will be able to provide great input and ideas to the Euralo. My main concern is to get the Euralo in a credible position with our ALAC and ICANN partners. I am looking forward meeting you soon. Kind regards, -- Patrick Vande Walle Check my blog at http://patrick.vande-walle.eu
participants (2)
-
Patrick Vande Walle -
Veronica Cretu