Wolf:

As previously stated, the time and date chosen was the time acceptable
to most people.

it is obvious but worth restaing that we are unlikely to find a
perfect time where literally everyone can participate, when you are
talking about a group this large. We also do need to move this along,
so that the new ALAC members can be in place and travel arrangements
made for them in good time for San Juan.


On 03/05/07, Wolf Ludwig <wolf.ludwig@comunica-ch.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> sorry, but I cannot make it for the suggested Tel-Conf. neither --
> and I do not understand the sense of such a Tel-Conf. when/where most of
> the people concerned, or a vast majority, cannot participate and contribute?
>
> Referring to some remarks about deadlines, according to my understanding
> it was Annette's proposal in her Mail from 20.04.07 we agreed on which was
> backed by Vittorio's Mail from 25.04.07 (copies below)!
>
> Regards,
> Wolf
>
> _______________
> [EURO-Discuss] Nominations - update
> Von: Annette Muehlberg <annette.muehlberg@web.de>
> An: Discussion for At-Large Europe <euro-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> Datum: 20/04/2007 18:45:37
>
> I think, to choose ALAC members first is a good procedure.
>
> Concerning the nomination period, I think we should try to do our best
> to come up with proposals until this sunday 22nd and start the
> discussion. If someone comes up with another proposal in the following
> week on ALAC and even some days later with another proposal for a board
> member, this is fine too.
>
> What do you think about the following schedule: ...
>
>
> [EURO-Discuss] Nominations - update II
> Von: Vittorio Bertola <vb@bertola.eu>
> An: Discussion for At-Large Europe <euro-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> Datum: 25/04/2007 13:57:48
>
> All,
> ...
>
> For the rest, I would follow Annette's suggestion and start the
> discussion on the two slates of candidates and on the number of Board
> members. In the revised schedule, voting was expected to start on April
> 29th but let's see how the discussion goes - if the discussion is still
> alive and productive, I'm also fine with waiting until May 5th for the vote.
> ...
> Regards,
>
> _____________
> Nick Ashton-Hart wrote Thu, 3 May 2007 11:53:
> >>From the email replies sent to the list, this time and date were the
> >best - more people could do this time and date than any of the others
> >- which is why we set it that way.
> >
> >If nobody else will propose an agenda, what I would suggest as a draft is:
> >
> >1) Discuss and agree the list of candidates - including whether or not
> >to include candidates who were proposed after the deadline.
> >
> >2) Discuss and agree the total number of board seats for this election cycle.
> >
> >3) Discuss and agree the length of the voting, the start date, and the
> >provisional list of voters and the number of days for ALSes not on the
> >call to provide their authorised voter.
> >
> >We would then bring the results of these items back to the list, not
> >for review, but as decisions.
> >
> >I will put this up on the Wiki as the *DRAFT* agenda which all ALSes
> >may then edit or extend - so we have something to start from.
> >
> >On 03/05/07, Annette Muehlberg <annette.muehlberg@web.de> wrote:
> >> All,
> >> concerning the tel conf tomorrow: Many people said they cannot take part (myself offered a different time, one and a half hours earlier). Rudi and myself asked what it is about, as no one proposed an agenda yet. I proposed to discuss all issues online. I guess, the best is, that those who actually have the chance in taking part come up with a proposal for procedure which will be presented to all of us online.
> >> best
> >> annette
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Rudi Vansnick schrieb:
> >> > This fits for me ... if at least we will have a clear agenda and no
> >> > discussions about what is NOT written/signed in MoU and Bylaws.
> >> >
> >> > Rudi Vansnick
> >> > Chair ISOC Belgium
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >--
> >Regards,
> >
> >Nick Ashton-Hart
> >PO Box 32160
> >London N4 2XY
> >United Kingdom
> >UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011
> >USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460
> >Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135
> >mobile: +44 (7774) 932798
> >Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com /
> >Skype: nashtonhart
> >Online Bio:   https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >EURO-Discuss mailing list
> >EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >
>
> comunica-ch
> phone +41 79 204 83 87
> www.comunica-ch.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> EURO-Discuss mailing list
> EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>


-- 
-- 
Regards,

Nick Ashton-Hart
PO Box 32160
London N4 2XY
United Kingdom
UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011
USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460
Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135
mobile: +44 (7774) 932798
Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com /
Skype: nashtonhart
Online Bio:   https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart