Many thanks Marika for accurately grasping all the action items of yesterday’s call ..
In light of the below notes and Jonathan’s earlier email, Jonathan and I thought it would be more clear if we highlight the following:
- We have agreed that it would be better to send the Liaison “Job description” out asap (Fri.), and have therefore set the deadline for 'Thursday 23h59 UTC' , for this not to be delayed till the following Monday ..
- We have also agreed to circulate the draft specifications for those who have the time to read it, and bearing in mind the mentioned document overload, will make sure the draft is linked from the GAC material (e.g. agenda, …) so that it is available and at hand for reading whenever needed ..
Hope this sounds reasonable ..
Kind Regards
--Manal
From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 4:06 PM
To: GAC-GNSO-CG@icann.org
Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] Action items / notes from 10/6 meeting
Please find below the action items / notes from today's GAC-GNSO Consultation Group meeting. Note the deadline of Friday 13 June to provide input on the proposed requirements & proposed selection process for the GNSO liaison to the GAC (attached here again for your convenience). The next meeting of the Consultation Group is scheduled for Tuesday 17 June at 13.00 UTC.
Action Items / Notes 10/6 Meeting
- CG members to provide comments by Friday 13 June at the latest on proposed requirements & proposed selection process for GNSO liaison to the GAC
- Include GAC liaison document as a link in the various materials instead of circulating separately not to create 'document overload' (note - this has already been included as a link in the briefing document)
- Include draft watermark to document to make clear it is a draft as well as pdf format to make clear there is scope for input from GAC as well as GNSO
- Present first two steps during joint meeting (Issue Scoping & Initiation)
- Show chart with all PDP phases - Marika to send revised PDP graphic to Manal and Jonathan
- Use feedback on survey to determine if/how input from GAC can/should be triggered during first two steps
- Suzanne to review comments / questions section in curent document
- What is impact of GAC involvement early on? Re. timing for example.
- Consider whether a 'quick' look procedure could be appropriate for the GAC to provide input on the Preliminary Issue Report (and be able to flag whether or not at the Issue Scoping phase there are any public policy concerns that may need to be considered)
- Objective: make GAC aware of all mechanisms available to provide input; enable GAC to provide input in a timely / meaningful way; if/when GAC decides to provide input, what are the consequences as well as impact on timing; how to manage multiple PDPs going on in parallel.
- Further consideration may need to be given to additional (staff) support to be able for the GAC to provide early input
- 'Triage' committee on the GAC side may also be an option to explore to be able to deal with requests coming in and/or manage 'quick look' procedure
- Add some bullets on ideas shared to presentation, noting that these are suggestions / ideas at this stages and not recommendations (yet)