Many thanks Suzanne and apologies for replying to earlier messages before I complete reading the whole thread ..

If I understand your proposal correctly, it is indeed the intention ..

The plan is to circulate a short, concise briefing note to update and set expectations of both the GAC and the GNSO .. I don't think, but I stand to be corrected, that we'll be attaching the full day to day and PDP documents .. Rather we will be preparing slides that reflect agreed parts of both work tracks ..

Kind Regards

--Manal

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Suzanne Radell
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 7:53 PM
To: Jonathan Robinson; GAC-GNSO-CG@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note

Hi Jonathan, and apologies for taking longer than expected.  I just sent an email out in the past five minutes.  Please let me know what you think.  One possible solution to avoiding a further delay in getting the briefing note out is to send the note out as it, with whatever edits you’ve received to date, and hold off on the attachments (write ups of the day to day and PDP work to date) pending further refinements.  Would that help?  Cheers, Suz

From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 1:39 PM
To: Suzanne Radell; GAC-GNSO-CG@icann.org
Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note

Thanks Suzanne.  Just checking, would like me to hold off on finalising the Briefing Note prior to you providing additional information / input? Jonathan

From: Suzanne Radell [mailto:SRadell@ntia.doc.gov]
Sent: 02 June 2014 22:01
To: Jonathan Robinson; GAC-GNSO-CG@icann.org
Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note

Thanks, Jonathan; glad to know the edits were helpful.  I plan to look over the material tonight and since we have cancelled tomorrow’s 9 a.m. call, I am shooting for a suggested approach tomorrow before noon my time; will that work?  Cheers, Suz

From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 4:58 PM
To: Suzanne Radell; GAC-GNSO-CG@icann.org
Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note

OK thanks Suzanne.  Your edits definitely improve the document so definitely a case of better late than never.

When do you think you can get the additional thoughts on the PDP track or are those not a condition for finalising the briefing?

Looking at your note below, I suspect that they are intended for the presentation to be delivered in London.  Am I correct?

Key point is to get the briefing out ASAP i.e. sufficiently ahead of London.  Jonathan.

From: Suzanne Radell [mailto:SRadell@ntia.doc.gov]
Sent: 02 June 2014 19:31
To: Jonathan Robinson; GAC-GNSO-CG@icann.org
Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note
Importance: High

Thanks, Jonathan, and apologies to all for not getting these suggested edits in sooner; I hope they can be taken into account.  The edits relate to the survey, which I have understood as an important first step in determining whether the existing/current means by which GAC members are informed about upcoming PDPs at the initial stage has value/utility or needs to be reconsidered.  It has been my impression that we intended to emphasize the importance of getting feedback on this stage from the GAC during our exchange in London.  I have some additional thoughts to share on the presentation of the PDP portion of our work and will do so separately.  Thanks, Suz

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 12:44 PM
To: GAC-GNSO-CG@icann.org
Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note

All,

I have revised the briefing note to accommodate suggested changes / inputs.

Some of the comments suggestions pertained more to our work as a group so we need to pick that up on list or in our meetings.

Please see attached the final version in word (in case last-minute changes are needed) and in PDF (for distribution) formats.

Thanks,

Jonathan