Many thanks Mikey for the bedrock of this work.
Also Manal for the careful critique and input.
I have given it a “once over” and made a few minor suggested tweaks.
Each is identified by a comment as my change tracking feature appeared to not work.
Tweaked version is attached.
Thinking ahead to our meeting on Sunday:
1. Manal & I need to circle back with Heather and possibly others on what the scope / agenda of the meeting is.
i.e. is it confined to the work of this group.
2. In any case, thinking about only the work of this group, slides 1-10 are excellent on a stand-alone basis to describe the work of this group.
Slide 10 ends with a series of discussion points / questions and that seems sensible. The presentation will naturally pause there.
3. I think I understand that slide 11 is then an the example of our early thinking and then slide 12 contains examples of current work that could be subject to process in slide 11.
Correct?
Thanks again for the excellent work on this.
Jonathan
Thanks Mikey for noting this ..
I do support and appreciate your friendly amendment ..
Kind Regards
--Manal
From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@haven2.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2014 2:45 PM
To: Manal Ismail
Cc: gac-gnso-cgs@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] revised version of the slide deck -- still plenty oftime for revisions before our next meeting
hi all,
i’ve rolled all of this conversation up into a new draft of the slides. there’s one remaining thing to note...
Manal noticed that “GNSO” doesn’t appear in on the title of the slide deck and added it. but that title is also the title of our group and “GNSO” doesn’t appear there either. i almost went ahead and changed it in the Charter before i submitted it, but decided to check with the rest of you. does everybody consider this a friendly amendment, as i do? i left Manal’s addition highlighted in red on this version of the deck to remind us to just quickly dispense with that question on our call.